The Crucible Critical Analysis

Words: 1171
Pages: 5

The easiest way to solve a problem in society is to dehumanize it and publically murder it for the support of all present peers. At least that is how the problem is solved in The Crucible play by Arthur Miller ,written in 1953, that recounts a historical fiction story of the town Salem, Massachusetts enveloped by hysteria during the time of the Salem Witch Trials. The play is very unique in the way the drama unfolds. Jean-Marie Bonnet , a scholar, explains this very phenomena in an article she wrote titled ,” Society vs. The Individual in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible. “ In the Article, she explains that Individual conflicts and societal conflicts run concurrent to each other in the play, yet I find the societal conflicts vastly more intriguing in their natures. The play is most interesting when one focuses on the societal drama of the play because of the complex problems that arise from the society of Salem at the time and contribute to mass hysteria such as: a mass catharsis due to the communal suppression of fear, a strife for cultural unicity, and a radical obloquy of the community on itself. Jean-Marie Bonnet is the author of an article titled, “ Society vs. The Individual in Arthur Miller’s …show more content…
Many scholarly articles have been written about the play such as Jean-Marie Bonnet’s “ Society vs. The Individual in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible”, which explains how the two types of conflicts run concurrently. The town experiences differing types of societal drama including: a mass catharsis due to the communal suppression of fear, a strife for cultural unicity, and a radical obloquy of the community on itself. All of these instances are moderately relatable to me in my life which further fascinates me about the society. The societal conflicts in The Crucible are the most intriguing to me because of the persevering themes and deep,involving conflicts of the