The Dred Scott Case

Words: 360
Pages: 2

Dred Scott was a slave and with the goal of bringing change, who after several failed attempted to buy his liberty and those of his family, sued his master for his freedom. The lawsuit created pressure between the North and the South that caused destruction to the national unity. After his request for freedom was turn down by the widowed of his later master, Dred Scott decided to sue for his freedom and took the matter in front of the Supreme Court. And lost the lawsuit, because the Supreme Court delivered a decision, by pronouncing that Dred Scott was still a slave and also ruled that Missouri Compromise was not in accordance with procedural rules; additionally, the court stated that all enslaved had no right of becoming United States citizens and that Congress had no right to decide about slavery the territories. …show more content…
The Dred Scott case drove another division between the North and South, and the issues became sovereignty versus the legal status of black American free labor. The decree infuriated the Northerner while it strengthened the Southerner. For the proslavery Southerners who often declare slaves to properties despite their difference, welcomed the decision of the supreme court and believed that western territories should be for free labor. For Northerner, this decision was like an announcement of war on all of the ideas that they had on freedoms granted to them by their states and territories, which maintain an ethical position to the policy of slavery. They believed that the denied for a slave to be freed was a conspiracy of the southerner who had snatch and controlled the federal government for the sole purpose threaten the lives and freedom of people; therefore, it entices the northerner to lower the status of the court in the