The Expensive-Tissue Hypothesis

Words: 434
Pages: 2

A hefty diet of cavemen turkey legs and brontosaurus burgers seems to be a fundamental aspect of human evolution. A study, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, examined the brain size of several primates. For the most part, larger bodied primates have larger brains across species; however, humans have brains that are exceptionally large and rich in neurons compared to their body size, while gorillas-three times more massive than humans- have smaller brains and lesser neurons. Why? Because gorillas are predominantly herbivorous primates (95-99% of their diet is plant based) and their raw, vegan diet requires hours upon hours of eating only plants to provide enough calories to support their body mass. Humans should thus continue chomping on meatballs.

All nonhuman apes have a similar brain-to-gut ratio but the human brain is proportionately larger and the gut is proportionately smaller by the same amount. The “Expensive-Tissue Hypothesis” published in 1995 by Aiello and Wheeler links brain growth to meat eating. Brain tissue is metabolically expensive and the gut tissue is the only other tissue that is as metabolically expensive
…show more content…
However they fail to comprehend that the need of sugar is only during metabolism, the encephalization of the brain is largely based on proteins and fats that can only be gained from meat. Neuroscience showed that the areas of the human brain that grew the most were related to a wide array of social skills. Slaughtering, butchering and skinning of carcasses and sharing of meat have inevitably contributed to the evolution of human socialization. Evolution of hunting and transition of tool making procedures to allow more efficient scavenging led to the development of capacities for planning, cooperation and intelligent thought processing. Socialization in turn resulted in evolution of