The Machine That Won The War Analysis

Words: 582
Pages: 3

Comparing and contrasting “The Interlopers” & “The Machine That Won the War” “The Interlopers” and “The Machine that Won the War” are both well-written short stories with very few main characters and a setting that closely influences the conflict. But they have very different plots and are different in the way they are told. The ways in which the characters interact with each other is also different. This paper talks about the characters, setting, and conflict in each.

The main characters in “The Interlopers” are Ulrich Von Gradwitz and Georg Znaeym. At the start of the story they are described like this: “Each prayed that misfortune might fall on the other” (Saki). And by the end of the story they have become friends, although their friendship is presumably short-lived. There are three main characters in “The Machine That Won the War”: Lamar Swift, “Executive director of the solar federation” (Asimov) John Henderson, Chief Programmer of Multivac during the war, and Max Jablonsky, previous Chief Interpreter of Multivac. In the pre-story time the three were not equals but they were working on the same side for the same goal. In “The Interlopers” the main characters were enemies who
…show more content…
In “The Interlopers” there are multiple lines and passages that reinforce the idea that the forest is really creepy. “The Machine That Won the War” is set inside the corridors of Multivac, a giant computer in the future. “The Machine That Won the War” is set shortly after the end of a war that lasted for ten years. The settings of “The Interlopers” and “The Machine That Won the War” are different in that “The Interlopers” is set in a very natural outdoors setting, (a forest) and “The Machine That Won the War” is set inside a high tech computer in the future. The settings are alike in that in both stories the plot is very much influenced by the