The Milgram Experiment

Words: 638
Pages: 3

The Milgram experiment was an experiment ran by Milgram in the early 1960s to test out how many people would disobey their moral code by being. He does this by setting up a test where a student answers a teacher, and the teacher shocks the student when wrong. However this caused some controversies because of people being scarred for life. Thinking they actually shocked and/or murdered a person. While this controversy is valid, that does not mean the experiment wasn’t. y how Milgram’s experiment is an accurate representation of how people react and how people can constantly disobey their own moral code.
One article that shows this is an article called “The Power of Situations” by Lee Ross and Richard E. Neisbett. The Article itself talks about obedience, and how people can disobey their moral code based on the situation and environment. The author states how people in a hurry are more likely to avoid people in need if they are in a hurry. As the authors stated, “If the subjects were in a hurry… only 10 percent helped. By contrast, if they were not in a hurry… about 63 percent of them helped.” (Pg 581)
Lee Ross and Richard E. Neisbett also goes on to say how appearance of a person may affect if you help someone or not. An example of this was
…show more content…
In the article, he explains how people will just be sheep, and follow whoever. His main point in the article is to try to deviate from the norm, even if it means to disobey one’s moral code. Brooks says, “To have good leaders you have to have good followers — able to recognize just authority, admire it, be grateful for it and emulate it. Those skills are required for good monument building, too.” (Pg 594) What he means by this is that you should try to not follow someone else, but to try to do your own thing. He wants people to know what they are honoring for, and to not just follow the leader without knowing what they’re