The Myth of Multitasking The argument made throughout “The Myth of Multitasking” by Christine Rosen is about the effects of multitasking on the human brain and how often multitasking can effect our lives. Multitasking is not a new concept, plus it has not been as major of an influence on human behavior. In her article, Rosen states that multitasking in the workforce and educational system has had a negative effect on the economy. Along with how multitasking affects people and their brains functioning on a day to day basis. Rosen does this by providing numerous cited sources from various studies and tests by doctors and professionals. In addition, Rosen provides information about the difference in brain activity between individuals who were multitasking and those who were focused on a singular task. The main argument by the author is supported thoroughly by valid sources and research from respected individuals and offers clear information about both sides of the argument. The main disagreement made in “The Myth of Multitasking” is that multitasking, while not an unacceptable concept, has had an adverse effect on behavior. An example…show more content… Rosen uses information gathered from brain scans of individuals who were distracted, or displaying multitasking behavior, and those who were not. The brain scans of the participants who were multitasking showed that the region of the brain called the striatum, which is most commonly associated with learning new skills, was most active whereas the brain scans of the focused individuals showed more activity in the hippocampus region, which is associated with storing and recalling information. This is a supportive statement since it identifies information clearly which shows how multitasking can affect short term and long term memory and information storage in the
