The Perils Of Indifference Essay

Words: 704
Pages: 3

Author and Holocaust survivor, Elie Wiesel in his speech, “The Perils of Indifference,” claims that indifference means death. He supports his claim by defining indifference as dangerous, inhuman, and a friend of the enemy. While also using emotionally loaded imagery and diction. Examples of this are the list of humanity’s “failures” and the references to his life during the Holocaust. Wiesel’s purpose is to emphasize indifference and its’ consequences to the people so that they acknowledge the horrors that they allowed to happen, make sure that they remember them and in turn prevent such horrors from happening again. He transitions from a thankful tone to a more somber and frank tone when addressing the excellencies of the evening. Ultimately, Elie Wiesel’s “The Perils of Indifference” is a speech that makes the audience aware of how dangerous indifference is and the consequences that were brought upon the world because of it.
The general argument made by author Elie Wiesel in his speech, “The Perils of Indifference” is that indifference means death. More specifically, Wiesel argues that because of humanity’s indifference many horrors were
…show more content…
Therefore meaning that although we are human we have the incapability to feel any kind of emotion. That incapability is what Elie Wiesel is addressing as “indifference” in his speech “The Perils of Indifference.” We can not allow ourselves to suffer from such inability or we as humans will lose that which makes life meaningful -- emotion. That is what we need to take from Wiesel’s speech. To think that because of the inability that is indifference we allowed such atrocities like the Holocaust and The Rwandan Genocide to happen is not only disappointing but worrying. That is the reason why it is vital for us to not only ask but learn from both the consequences of action and