The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

Words: 512
Pages: 3

During world War Two the United States was faced with constant pressure from Japan and Germany regarding the recent conflicts that had taken place, they were not sure of how to effectively end the war in a quick and timely manner. Throughout history America has been known as the top economic and military superpower, and this time it would be no different. The bombings used to suppress the axis powers came under intense scrutiny mainly due in part to that there were surely alternative methods that could have been substituted for the bombing runs. possibly resulting in numerous lives saved on all sides of the conflict. There was no doubt that there were similar but safer ways to manage the engagement in the coming years, the question is what …show more content…
Through analyzing refreshed military doctrine and the rules of engagement during the time it is observed that there were abundant substitutes that could have been exploited to extinguish the developing opposition. The other significant courses of action consisted of but were not limited to, creating and presenting a demonstration to the emperor of Japan with hopes of persuading him to surrender, or by waiting on reinforcements to come from the Soviet Union… General Henry H. Arnold had this to say about the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, “It always appeared to us that, atomic bomb or no atomic bomb, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” In some instances people could say that both of these specific bombings may have been racially motivated and could have been executed for the simple purpose of retaliation for the barbaric acts committed on both sides of the seemingly never-ending skirmish. Indicating the previous point, roughly at least more than half of the casualties in the separate battles proved to be civilians, such as the case in the bombings of Hiroshima and