The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

Words: 682

Pages: 3

Open Document

Gerrymandering is something that I do not agree with at all. It is defined as, “Manipulating the political districts to rig the outcome of elections to favor one political party over another.” ("What is Gerrymandering?"). This means dividing up districts into crazy, abnormal lines which sometimes don't even make since on how they have been divided. This idea came from a founding father named Elbridge Gerry. He was the fifth vice president as well as the governor of Massachusetts. Gerry was the first to sign a bill that created an abnormal district designed to elect Democratic Republicans over the Federalists in 1812 (Donnelly). Gerrymandering is a legal action, but I believe it is very unfair. Gerrymandering and redistricting are two similar but different ideas. Redistricting is the drawing of legislative district boundary lines after each ten year census, while gerrymandering is the drawing of boundary lines for …show more content…
This session was held in order to redraw the districts; this wasn't the outcome. The House and the Senate could not come together and there was not progress ding made on the redrawing. This issue was then taken to the United States Supreme Court for a redrawing to be made. In 2004 there was a case Vieth v. Jubelirer, about Pennsylvania. They lost two representatives which resulted in a redrawing. Pennsylvania had the Republican majority and was redrawn to favor Republicans over Democrats. Vieth was a Pennsylvania resident and was also a democrat (Vieth). He argued that the redrawing was unconstitutional, but was denied by a lower court. Overall, in my opinion, I feel as though gerrymandering should be unconstitutional. It is definitely not fair to those party's who are not the majority just because they didn't get to draw their districts the way they intended. I believe that the United States Supreme Court should be involved by

The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

Gerrymandering is unconstitutional because parties and the people are unequally represented in the redrawing of districts that occurs. The goal of a partisan gerrymander is to attempt to make opposing side waste votes, and that’s what the efficiency gap measures. Partisan gerrymandering is not fair because it forces the opposing side to waste votes, which are all votes that are beyond what is necessary. There is a certain amount of votes that is needed to win the district, and any votes that go beyond…

Words 367 - Pages 2

The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

unnecessary problems to our community. Voting is one huge role we play in as the people voting for what representative we want in office. But the way gerrymandering setup is to ensure the power of one party to win the majority of seats in an election than the number which its percentage of the total vote authorizes it too. view changes. Gerrymandering allows the absolute majority party within a given State to increase the number of seats it can win in the future…

Words 321 - Pages 2

Gerrymandering Pros And Cons

Rocco Capozza Mr. Neglia Government and Politics H: Block B 21 November 2017 Constitutional Debate Project: Gerrymandering Gerrymandering is an unfair practice in which certain political parties or interest groups look to change the outcomes of elections by redrawing the borders of electoral districts so that it gives one party an unfair advantage over its rivals. Gerrymandering contravenes two essential components, compactness and equality of size. Today, partisan elected official’s are using modern…

Words 326 - Pages 2

The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

The video explains what gerrymandering is and how it works using examples from the animal kingdom. It starts by showing a new government that is a democracy and has a legislative branch. In this system each citizen gets one vote and they are split up into ranges and each range will elect one representative. These ranges stay in place until a census taker comes along and notices that the population has moved and grown, this mean that the ranges boundaries must be redrawn. The representatives hire…

Words 1183 - Pages 5

Gerrymandering Pros And Cons

Janaya Colbert Gerrymandering This article is from a law journal that discusses the 15th amendment and the types of gerrymandering. Gerrymandering is the drawing of electoral districts to benefit or disadvantage a particular group,according to the article. While there are two types of gerrymandering, only racial gerrymander violates the 15th Amendment. The 15th amendment originated by the Republican party, because they felt giving blacks suffrage meant they would likely vote Republican,…

Words 462 - Pages 2

The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

Gerrymandering is the process of manipulating political district boundaries to benefit a particular political party. Elected officials redraw district lines every decade, and the party in power can use the opportunity to move boundaries to minimize opponents’ votes and increase their odds of staying in power. Gerrymandering often results in oddly shaped districts, where cities, townships and even neighborhoods are split and sliced apart. The practice can be used to limit the power of particular…

Words 144 - Pages 1

Gerrymandering Pros And Cons Essay

I’m personally not a proponent of Gerrymandering. But let me tell you why it is not the end of the world that it occurs. First off, Gerrymandering is the drawing of district lines to favor a candidate or party for election in that district. There has been a large amount of chatter from the left that this is a method of sabotaging elections. In approaching this from a political economic standpoint, gerrymandering will likely yield positive results in the short run for the party that is doing it, but…

Words 581 - Pages 3

The Pros And Cons Of Racial Gerrymandering

states from taking part in "racial gerrymandering." Racial gerrymandering happens when a state depends on race to draw up limits of at least one particular constituent locale. Such gerrymandering is impermissible in light of the fact that it hurts a person, who is subjected to a racial characterization, and the person's lawmaker, who trusts his essential commitment is to speak to just a particular racial gathering. The Supreme Court sees racial gerrymandering as so heinous that states can't get…

Words 568 - Pages 3