Unquestionably, this case that involved a claim to protect sex offenders from being charged for violation to SORNA (Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act), or in reality the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, if they had been convicted for a sexual assault or offense prior to the act going into effect. Therefore, this would have protected the offender and left individuals vulnerable to future victimization, which would seem to violate a victim’s rights.