Thomas Jefferson Response To The Declaration Of Independence

Words: 651
Pages: 3

1. In the first paragraph of the Declaration of Independence, it is stated by Jefferson that the reason he wrote this document is to declare the unity of the people of America, as well as give an answer to why the United States were breaking away from England. 2. According to the declaration, the government acquires its power through the peoples consent. If something happens to where the people decide the government no longer deserves that power, then the people have the right to revolt which in turn abolishes the government's power. 3. The unalienable rights that Jefferson states is “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”. This claims that each person has these natural rights at birth and should not be taken away. 4. Jefferson …show more content…
The final statement of the Declaration of Independence has a very firm tone, giving the document a stern ending. Because of this, the message is made clear and shows that the States are serious about leaving …show more content…
When Jefferson speaks of “the laws of nature and of Nature's God”, he is referencing the unalienable rights with a religious tone. A law that helps present one of these laws of nature could be the right of religious freedom in America. 7. Self-evident: Meaning something is clearly true and requires no proof or explanation.

The four truths that Jefferson claims to be self-evident is that all mean are created equal and that they are all given certain unalienable rights; Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. These claims can be considered self-evident by some and not by others. Many people would automatically believe that these claims are the truth and should be universally accepted, while others may argue that some people actually do not deserve these rights. 8. Absolute despotism: Absolute authority; tyranny.

When Jefferson says that it is the “right and duty” of mankind to fight this absolute despotism, he is saying it because this despotism goes against the unalienable rights he also mentions in the Declaration. It goes against them as when the King refuses rights to the people (specifically the Colonies in this case), he is taking away their