Thomas Jefferson's Response To The Constitution

Words: 457
Pages: 2

First, the Constitution is not a godly document. It’s not sent by the heavens to tell us, Americans, what we should and should not to do. Additionally, what we call the “founding fathers” were not geniuses at all, nor are they superior to us because they wrote this document. The Constitution is not the bible, nor is it a lifestyle. It is a foundation where we can build and overturn ideas. Of course, the Constitution was written by very flawed people who owned slaves and thought their whole lifespan was to around thirty. Today, gay marriage is legal and women can run for president. Times are different, and we should consider the amount of social, moral, and economic transitions our country has been though. However, I disagree with Thomas Jefferson’s …show more content…
However, the Constitution is broad enough for people to interpret it to how they see fit. Jefferson’s view of freedom from a controlling political power is valid, but he should understand that the Constitution is not an end all be all system, but a living, breathing document that can be altered, not by blocks of nineteen years, but as time gradually passes. Renewing the Constitution every nineteen years would lead to political instability because we never know whether our way of life would drastically change as new groundwork gets thrown in the mix. Many things evolve and change in twenty years, let alone ten. Therefore, having a strong, formal document limits people from experimenting with ideas that may work horribly for our country. Supporters of Jefferson’s argument may state that it is worth the risk to change the Constitution every generation, but because each generation is so different, not everyone would agree with new ideas, leading to