To Kill A Mockingbird Book Vs Movie Analysis

Words: 1262
Pages: 6
Open Document
When a book undergoes the artistic transformation of becoming a movie, or very rarely when a movie comes to be a book, one would expect to see some variations between the two. We see this in the two renditions of To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee. The original handheld, thought provoking option of a book, leaves you with the choice of creating a picture in your head: casting your own actors and setting your own scenes. This could lead to a different portrayal of the book, then someone else's, providing a beautiful, majestic, getaway for your mind. With each great literary source, one might find themselves getting trapped beyond the pages. For others who may be seeking a more visual medium, one where the names have faces and the locations are set, a movie could be a better alternative.
When examining a classic novel such as the 1960’s, To Kill a Mockingbird, and the later, but still classic, cinematic film, the storylines are essentially the same. The story follows Atticus Finch, a small town lawyer, who after being widowed and with …show more content…
Tom was a hard-working man who because of his overwhelming generosity and color of his skin, involuntarily got himself involved in a prejudice rape case. It was made clear, in both the novel and film, that his sentencing was due to a biased and racist jury (all white men at the time). Mayella Ewell, the woman accusing him of rape, shows little to no remorse at the sound of his sentence, showing readers just how cruel people during this time were. Not only was the town extremely devastated for Tom, but everyone who knew Atticus, including Jem and Scout as well. Being so young, it is understandable to assume that Scout would be confused by such a trial, as most adults were. Though it is clear in the film that Atticus is upset, he stays strong, meticulously watching his posture and
Show More

Related Documents: To Kill A Mockingbird Book Vs Movie Analysis

To Kill A Mockingbird Book Vs Movie Analysis

The film version of To Kill a Mockingbird is different than the novel because there was changed elements, there were differences in the characterizations of the characters, and secondary characters were used to teach the children themes. Several scenes were different in the movie than in the book. Scout was also described different in the movie than in the book. Also there was a lesson taught by Tom Robinson and by Boo Radley in the book and the movie. In the book, there are different elements…

Words 686 - Pages 3

To Kill A Mockingbird Movie Vs Book Analysis

The novel “To Kill a Mockingbird” is a well-known and thought-provoking book. The film portraits the novel in a different aspect. Personally, I found the book to be a true representation of life back then. I enjoyed reading the novel, and watching the film. The film and the novel overall have the same storyline. However, there were some scenes not included in the film. I believe that the film gives an acceptable representation of the novel. The book provided a better depiction than the film. The…

Words 444 - Pages 2

To Kill A Mockingbird Book Vs Movie Analysis

that the movie To Kill a Mockingbird was somewhat like the book, although there were a few scenes that I would have liked to be in the movie. One scene being when Jem and Scout go to Calpurnia’s church. Having this scene in the movie would show how important Tom Robinson’s case was for Maycomb’s African American population. Another scene that I would have appreciated if it were included was when Aunt Alexandra came to stay with Scout, Jem and Atticus. By having this scene in the movie, it would…

Words 346 - Pages 2