To Kill A Mockingbird Moral Analysis

Words: 871
Pages: 4

What would life be like without morales or means of life? Harper Lee shows a perfect example of these circumstances in the book To Kill a Mockingbird. Despite the fact that everyone around them is prejudice and racist, Jem and Scout still manage to learn the values of morality and maintain a positive outlook on life. They experience a plethora of unjust activities throughout the novel, but they overcome these events and collaborate to learn the lessons that come along with them. Scout and Jem are ridiculed when their classmates make fun of the fact their father is defending a black man in court, but they venerate their father’s wishes by not fighting the classmates. Harper Lee highlights the fact that morales are required in order to have a cohesive society in the book …show more content…
Boo Radley is considered to be a freak by the children of Maycomb, Jem and Scout included. After a few weeks of receiving gifts from a hole in a tree, Jem and Scout notice that the hole has been filled up with cement. Jem asks Mr. Nathan Radley why he filled it and he said it was because the tree was dying and that is what you do to dying trees, but he is actually just squelching Boo’s tendency to give the children gifts. “Is that tree dyin’? That tree’s as healthy as you are, Jem. Mr. Radley said it was dyin’.” (Lee 84) Jem then realizes that Boo is the good one and Nathan is actually the bad Radley brother. Another example of tolerance in To Kill a Mockingbird is when Walter Cunningham Jr. is over at the Finch household for dinner and Scout makes some crude remarks. “He’s just a Cunningham.” (Lee 33) The cook for the Finch family, Calpurnia, takes Scout into another room and berates her for saying these things and teaches her that all people deserve to be treated impeccably when they are company. These are just a few of the many instances where Jem and Scout learn to be tolerant of