Transformational Leadership Theory

Words: 908
Pages: 4

Transformational leadership theory is a style of leadership where the leader works with employees to identify the needed change, creating a vision to guide the change through inspiration, and executing the change in tandem with committed members of the group. It also serves to enhance the motivation, morale, and job performance of followers through a variety of mechanisms. These include connecting the follower's sense of identity and self to the project and the collective identity of the organization. Transformational leadership is a role model for followers in order to inspire them and raise their interest in the project. The followers will take greater ownership for their work, understanding the strengths, and weaknesses of other followers. …show more content…
I was living in Charleston, South Carolina when Reuben Greenberg was the Chief of Police. Chief Greenberg’s leadership style if transformational. Greenberg worked will with his officers trying to make Charleston a safer and better place to live. With his experience from other agencies, he was able to use that knowledge when making certain decisions for the City of Charleston. Greenburg started the “foot and horseback patrols in the area, along with drug-sniffing dogs, which have been successful in making 900 arrests a year for narcotics possession or resale (Hicks, 2000).” Greenburg knew that the high crime areas in the City of Charleston needed to be safe for the public and …show more content…
6: The joint-decision-making environment of participative leadership is composed of four components. Identify the two components that would work best in larger police departments and the two components that would work best in smaller police departments. Autocratic leader makes decision without soliciting and feedback from the subordinates. Consultation leader solicits subordinates’ opinions but makes the decision alone. Autocratic and consultation would work best with smaller police departments. You are able to handle situations and make decision without having to report to someone. The decision which was made can be easily distribute among the police department without having any confusion. They is not wrong with retrieving information from your subordinates. With a small department, it is a good idea to solicit subordinates’ opinions because it can lead you in the right direction on making your decisions. The workload can usually be completed by minimum man power. Joint leader discusses the decision with subordinates, and collectively the group makes the final choice, with the leader having no more influence on the choice than subordinates. Delegation leader gives the group authority to make the decision, specifying only the outer limits on the choice. Joint and delegation would work better with larger police departments. With large police departments, you will many different departments. Each of the departments within that section will have its own subordinates.