Twelve Angry Men

Words: 468

Pages: 2

Open Document

Imagine living in a world where no one asks any questions. Everyone takes every situation at face value, and never would anyone question the most popular narrative. What if the most popular narrative was misguided or misinformed? How would one deliver justice?
The play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose asks those very questions. Following an exhausting week-long murder trial, a jury of men who are all very different meet in the jury room to discuss the trial and decide on a verdict. Though eleven out of the twelve men agree that the accused is guilty, one juror disagrees and asks to discuss the trial further. With a surprising amount of reluctance, the other jurors begrudgingly agree to carry on with the discussion until there is only juror …show more content…
Juror NO. 8 disagrees, and wants to discuss the details of the trial before he decides to condemn the accused. Many of the other jurors are annoyed with this man’s request to rethink a decision the rest have already decided they’re positive on. One such man is Juror NO.7. Juror NO.7 is characterized as thinking this trial is a waste of his time, and the audience’s first impressions of him is that he just wants to leave. In fact, one of his first line’s in the play is, “This better be fast. I’ve got tickets to see the Seven Year Itch tonight.” Juror NO.7 already decided the accused boy is guilty, and now he is not willing to wait even a moment to let the rest of the jurors decide. After several serious debates leading to a jury that’s split six to six on deciding whether the boy is guilty or not guilty, Juror NO.11 accuses Juror NO.7 of not taking it seriously enough after he changes his vote to not guilty, but later in the play, we see that Juror NO.7 no longer blindly follows the opinions of Juror NO.10, and truly believes there is a reasonable doubt at the end of the play, when Juror NO. 3 stands alone in his belief that the accused boy is definitively

Prejudice In Twelve Angry Men

amendment of the United States constitution states, “No person shall...be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law”. This ensures that no one is given a fair and impartial trial. Due Process is central to the plot of “Twelve Angry Men” by Reginald Rose. In the story 12 jury members are faced with the murder trial of a young man, accused of killing his father. One of the purposes of the play is to expose the prejudices that are brought into the courtroom by a jury. In the…

Words 581 - Pages 3

Twelve Angry Men Essay

"Its not easy to stand alone against the ridicule of others". Twelve Angry Men is more than a play, it is a reminder of our social responsibility. Discuss. Twelve Angry Men is a legal drama, written by Reginald Rose during the heightened period of 1950's McCarthyism. The didactic play presents a cross section, examining 1950's America during a period of immense suspicion and uncertainty. Roses' play reminds us of the importance of responsibility and integrity, emphasising qualities such as courage…

Words 1237 - Pages 5

Essay on Twelve Angry Men

Twelve Angry Men Juror 3 The diversity of the jurors in twelve angry men played a crucial role in the entertainment value and plot of the film. Some argued for empathy, while others based their opinions on logic. However one individual based his decision solely on a personal experience that obviously traumatized him to the extent that all logical and social attributes that he possessed were discarded. Juror three more commonly referred to as the antagonist of the…

Words 406 - Pages 2

Twelve Angry Men Essay

Tweleve angry Men The movie Twelve Angry Man is a drama which was written by Reginald Rose and was broadcast as a television play in 1954. It became a successful film in 1957 which concerned the deliberations of the jury of a homicide trial. It was a strained debate between twelve gentlemen about an 18-year-old boy who was accused to kill his father guilty or not guilty. It was a really interesting and dramatic situation. In the movie, there are 12 men with different characteristics. However…

Words 560 - Pages 3

Prejudice In Twelve Angry Men

is a learned trait. You’re not born prejudiced; you’re taught it. In the modern drama Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, the story tells about 12 jurors in a room together who are tasked with deciding the verdict on a murder charge against a 19 year old for murdering his father. As evidence and arguments come to light, the twelve juror’s personalities clash as they choose on this final verdict. Twelve Angry Men demonstrated not only that life lesson on prejudice during the text, but also a lesson…

Words 743 - Pages 3

Twelve Angry Men Essay

Our judicial system is inadequate because people can still be biased even with the knowledge of facts and evidence. This is conveyed in the play, Twelve Angry Men by Rose Reginald. People are confused as to why we leave one’s life in the hands of those who are inexperienced and untrained. Many factors influence and contribute to our opinions, some may cause us to stray from the right verdict. Everyone came from different backgrounds and had different experiences, resulting in the various views and…

Words 865 - Pages 4

Stereotypes In Twelve Angry Men

The play Twelve Angry Men shows us how everyone looks at a situation differently. How each person looks at an issue and biases it on their past. Everybody goes through things or is thought things as they grow up and it sticks with you, especially your personal experiences. Also there are stereotypes associated with each race or culture which make people think of one another differently. Many people who live in a neighborhood with predominantly one race and is attacked by someone of another race may…

Words 646 - Pages 3

Essay Twelve Angry Men

Twelve Angry Men is a movie that was made in 1957 by Reginald Rose based on actual life occurrences of a juror. The movie is about a New York jury that was deliberating after the trial of an 18-year-old Puerto Rican teenager that was accused with murder for stabbing his day to death. If the young man is convicted he could face the death penalty or the electric chair. This play also concerns twelve jurors reaching to the same decision and dealing with multiple different individuals that make up a…

Words 1325 - Pages 6

Essay on Twelve Angry Men

a General Journal | | |General |Subsidiary | | | |Ledger |Ledger | |Date |Details |Debit |Credit |Debit |Credit | |2013…

Words 1247 - Pages 5

TWELVE ANGRY MEN Essay

Second vote Guilty- third vote Guilty- fourth vote Not Guilty- fifth vote Not Guilty- Sixth vote Not Guilty- Seventh vote Not guilty- eighth vote Not guilty- ninth 7th juror Likes baseball, rude, selfish, impatient He sells marmalade, sales men Guilty-First vote Guilty- Second vote Guilty- third vote Guilty- fourth vote Guilty- fifth vote Not Guilty- sixth vote Not Guilty- Seventh vote Not guilty- eighth Not guilty- ninth 8th juror Thoughtful and gentle, He is devoted to justice…

Words 675 - Pages 3