Tybalt Is To Blame In Shakespeare's Romeo And Juliet

Words: 421
Pages: 2

I think that there isn’t any single person who really takes all the blame, however, when it comes to the most amount of blame, I think Tybalt certainly takes the cake. So, to start, one reason he takes most of the blame is because he’s very, VERY hotheaded. He HATES peace. Don’t believe me when I say he hates peace? Just read this quote that he said, then tell me what you think: “What, drawn, and talk of peace? I hate the word as I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee.” (1.1.72-73). This provides evidence that Tybalt is against peace. Second of all, it seems like Tybalt really, really, REALLY does not like Romeo. When Romeo is at the party, Tybalt spots him there. He tells Lord Capulet to give him his sword so he can kill Romeo. Lord Capulet says that Romeo isn’t a problem, and doesn’t bother to give Tybalt his sword. …show more content…
Tybalt argues that “It fits when such a villain is a guest. I’ll not endure him.” (1.5.82-83). This gives evidence that Tybalt either hates Romeo, or he’s doing this just because he hates the house (Montague) that Romeo is from. And finally, the last, but most important point, is the fact that Tybalt fights with Mercutio. In Act 3, Tybalt gets in an argument with Mercutio. And when Romeo shows up, and acts passive toward him, he gets mad enough that he decides to fight Mercutio. They fight, and Romeo tries to get between them to get them to stop fighting. But when Romeo actually does get between them, Tybalt sees his chance and thrusts his sword under Romeo’s arm, stabbing and killing