Tyranny Of The Majority In John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

Words: 1555
Pages: 7
Open Document
John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty explores the dichotomy between individual liberty and a mass society. The conflict arising from this dichotomy exists in what Mill refers to as “the tyranny of the majority” (8). Mill elucidates on the tyranny of the majority as a weakness in governments that are buttressed by majority rule because the interests of the majority can surpass and often stifle minority groups. Thus, the tyranny of the majority can rival the severity of other tyrannies, and at times exceed them given that the majority’s tyranny is not restricted solely to the political sphere. The influence of the majority can dictate not just legislation, but personal thoughts and opinions as well. However, while Mill is able to present a compelling argument antagonizing the majority, he is unable to present viable solutions to solving this problem. That being said, this paper will examine how Mill fails to present a successful argument on how to constrain the tyranny of the majority, evident in his failures to consider the pivotal role of the majority in legislation, the difficulty of altering a pro-majority state, as well as the utility of majority rule and the evolution …show more content…
All of which results in the impracticality of his aim to constrain the tyranny of the majority. In a perfect society equal weight would be given to the voices of the majority and minority groups; however, the evolution into a democratic republic stipulates delegation of the people through their government. Yet, it is impossible to delegate to all people in a society, and until a more sufficient way is proven, it will remain prudent to serve the interests of the
Show More

Related Documents: Tyranny Of The Majority In John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

Essay about Marriage Equality

the debate over the equality of marriage in the United States has not yet lead to a unified solution. Often referred to as marriage equality, same-sex marriage arguments in the United States have been spiking controversial debates ever since Richard John Baker and James Michael McConnell applied for marriage license at Hennepin County District Court on May 18, 1970. The clerk at the court, Gerald Nelson, denied the couple’s application without any consideration. According to Mr. Nelson, as they were…

Words 2044 - Pages 9

Essay on Is the Harm Principle Harmful?

Arnav Sur Social Foundations III Paper: II Professor Michael Shennefelt Prompt: 4 John Stuart Mill Is the Harm Principle harmful? Liberty and individual freedoms in the 21st century are subject to intense debate between lawmakers, political leaders and citizens. We live in a world where governments and communities, to a certain extent, have control over the rights of people. America has made the use of marijuana and other drugs illegal, the drinking age is twenty-one, there are instances of…

Words 1583 - Pages 7

John Stuart Mill Research Paper

Lecture Outline: John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) 1. brief, why do we need limits on government’s ability to act? 2. Freedom of action: When can society legitimately interfere? 3. Liberty of Thought & Discussion: how much? Reasons? (3-1/2 reasons) 4. Individuality %%%%%%% Why study Mill? What does he add to Classical Liberalism? utilitarian value of liberty for individual, society; Why is individual liberty important? what is the social value of individual or eccentric opinions and actions, even…

Words 2655 - Pages 11

Aristotle Begins The Politics By Defining The City As A Political Partnership Essay example

that what was good for the collective was not necessarily good for the individual and attempts to force individuals to conform to a social standard should be viewed as suspect. For Mill, the only way to ensure happiness for man was to maximize his liberty. Although Mill might agree with Marx that general theories of ethics are meaningless, he believed the utility principle combined with the no harm principle could ensure the greatest good for the greatest number. Far from being absolute, ethics and…

Words 4081 - Pages 17

Essay about answers q2

own individual happiness with the happiness of all. Neither the happiness of the individual nor the happiness of all is worth pursuing, since neither is attainable in this life. Instructor Explanation: The answer can be found in John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism, p. 12. Question 5. Question : Tom Regan’s view of animals is that Student Answer: They are important but not quite as important as human beings CORRECT They have rights, which means that they should never be used…

Words 1829 - Pages 8