Unforgiveness In The Holocaust

Words: 1099
Pages: 5

In a contemplate to the deep pain of Simon Wiesenthal during the Holocaust, some weigh on his silence as a symbol of unforgiveness and a malice judgment on the offensive mass crimes. Moreover, it is an act of vengeance when there is no justice and humanity exist on the earth. In the concentration camp where many are suffering from the brutalities and tortures, Josek, Simon's friend, believes that unforgiving is the fair verdict that the helpless people should stand before the horrendous mass crimes (66). Probably, Josek thinks that the dying Nazi carries all inhuman treatment of his family and all the Jews. Additionally, he will feel consciously comfortable with his revengeful decision because he believes that it is the only way for the perpetrator …show more content…
However, unforgiveness stand before many eyes on Simon's question. Bolek, the priest, says: "One thing is certain: you can only forgive a wrong that has been done to yourself" (81-82). Bolek advises the direct bullying as one condition for forgiving, but he feels that you can forgive the one who blames himself and show regrets for his evil acts. However, Karl shows a passion and remorse for his terrified crimes; some believe that repentance needs time and numerous evidence to grant forgiveness. Jew and Christian believe that only God gives the remission of sins. Thus, Kushner, the Rabbi Laureate of Temple Israel, advises "if someone honestly wants forgiveness, he or she should turn to God (Kushner 184). This passage came to Eva Fleischner when she stresses the daily Christian's prayer "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us" (Page 140). In a few words, both explain that God grants forgiveness and only, the direct victims should forgive his perpetrators and not the indirect offenders because victims are not able to forgive murder. Robert Brown claims that he cannot respond to Karl's pled, but instead he would tell Karl to seek forgiveness from the Diven Mercy directly (124). Doubtfully, he respects Simon's silence and reaches to one fact is murders can not be forgiven because no one should forgive on behalf of others. Moreover, No one with such a terrible experience can offer this kind of privilege for a killer. Strongly, we can hear the voice of Andre Stein when he asks who can think that a perpetrator of the human crime is genuine in his repentance? And how will be the feelings of the victims and the survivors? (251). In that respect, people can never forgive under this circumstance and may some ask for the life sentence of the killer. To comprehend it adequately, I can