Us Constitution Vs Nevada Constitution Essay

Words: 1124
Pages: 5

The United States Constitution and the Nevada Constitution are both historical documents that outline the structure of government and positions the unalienable rights of their citizens. Due to the supremacy of the United States Constitution, many sections of the Nevada Constitution parallel that of the United States Constitution including the separation of power between branches and a bill of rights. On the other hand, there are a number of differences that individualize the two constitutions including the broad powers of the legislature and the amendment process. Similar to the United States Constitution, the Nevada Constitution also enforces a separation of powers between branches. The idea of a separation of powers was brought up by French political thinker, Baron de la Brede et de Montesquieu, who thought of it as a way to avoid tyranny (Ginsberg et al. 31). For this reason, the federal government created three separate branches that would later be adopted by the Nevada Constitution. The following branches enforce checks and balances against each other so as to balance the power; legislative, executive and judicial.
In both constitutions, the legislative department is bicameral, or consisting of two
…show more content…
For example, the votes in the federal constitution only apply to those members are present. Whereas, the Nevada constitution requires a vote from all members whether they are present or not. The only exception to this is during the step of ratification, which requires only present voters. This is mainly due to the fact that the ratification process of a state constitution applies to the people and not representatives. With that being said, the Nevada Constitution does not have the same alternative method for amending the constitution unless the legislature feels that the entire constitution must be revised, in which case the legislature would need a vote of 2/3 of each house (NV Const. art.