Wainwright V. Gideon Case

Words: 594
Pages: 3

In June of 1961, a burglary occurred at the Bay Harbor Pool Room in Panama City, Florida. A witness claimed to have seen Clarence Earl Gideon in the poolroom early that morning. Based on this accusation alone, the police arrested him and charged him with breaking and entering with intent to commit petty larceny. Too poor to afford a lawyer, Gideon appeared at the Florida Circuit Court alone and requested that the judge appoint a lawyer to him as entitled by his Sixth Amendment right to counsel (Oyez). The judge stated that he could not appoint counsel to represent Gideon because “under the laws of the State of Florida, the only time the court can appoint counsel to represent a defendant is when that person is charged with a capital offense” (Justia Law). …show more content…
Gideon studied law in the prison library where he reaffirmed his belief that the trial judge had breached his constitutional right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment. He claimed that the amendment was still applicable to the State of Florida through the Due Process Clause of the 14 Amendment. He filed a petition with the Supreme Court of Florida for habeas corpus and filed suit against the Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections, Louie L. Wainwright. After that petition was rejected, Gideon petitioned to the Supreme Court of the United States to hear his case, to which the Court granted Gideon’s petition for a writ of certiorari. The question presented at trial was: does the Sixth Amendment’s right to counsel in criminal cases extend to felony defendants in state