Wayne Williams Circumstantial Evidence

Words: 603
Pages: 3
Open Document
The trial of Wayne Williams began on January 6, 1982. The key evidence in the state’s case against Wayne Williams was the fiber evidence found on the majority of the victims. Also, circumstantial evidence was an important aspect in the trail. This included the testimony of several witnesses. Many testified that they saw Williams with the victims, suggesting that he had solicited sexual favors. On February 27, 1982, over a month after the trail had begun a jury found Wayne Williams guilty of two counts of murder. The jury only deliberated for eleven hours before finding Williams guilty. Wayne Williams was sentenced to two consecutive life terms in the Georgia state prison at Reidsville. Twenty three years after the conviction of Wayne Williams DeKalb County, Georgia, Police Chief Louis Graham ordered the reopening of the murder cases of five boys Wayne Williams were accused of killing in DeKalb …show more content…
The fiber evidence proved intensely that many of the victims had contact with Williams in proximity to their deaths. Witnesses also placed the victim in contact with Williams. Overall the persecution vetted their evidence immensely and proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Wayne Williams was the Atlanta Child Murderer. As stated earlier, DNA evidence was not widely accepted at the time of the Atlanta Child Murders investigation. Today DNA is a staple in large amount of criminal conviction. Had DNA evidence been available during the time of the investigation into Wayne Williams, it would have further proved his guilt. Investigators were able to exclude ninety eight of the world population from a thirty year old DNA sample. It’s a possible that had the evidence been examine thirty years prior it was be an exact match to Wayne Williams. Though Williams’ continue to maintain that he is innocent, time and time again scientific evidence have proven his
Show More

Related Documents: Wayne Williams Circumstantial Evidence

Wayne Williams Evidence

Hair and fiber evidence are very important in forensic science. Hairs contain DNA that can be used to locate and identify the suspect(s). Fibers can occur naturally as plant and animal fibers, but they can also be man-made. An example of a fiber would be linen. In the Wayne Bertram Williams case, hair from Williams’ dog appeared “consistent” on at least 9 victims, according to Mr. Harold Deadman, an FBI agent. Williams, 23, & also a music producer, was convicted of killing 2 of 29 african american…

Words 434 - Pages 2

Hair And Fiber Analysis: The Wayne Williams Case

and fibers, it can be determined whether or not someone was murdered or attacked by an animal. The Wayne Williams case was determined due to hair and fiber analysis. Many people argued that Wayne Williams did not commit the crimes he was accused of, which was murdering both children and adults in Atlanta, Georgia. It was said that evidence was circumstantial, which indeed it was. Today Wayne Williams resides in a state prison due to the crime that he has committed despite all arguments. Harold Deadman…

Words 323 - Pages 2

Essay about wayne williams 2

Running head: Wayne Williams 1 Wayne Williams Terrica McCaskill 4306-Criminal Behavioral Analysis Faulkner University January 18, 2014 Abstract Wayne Williams was officially convicted of two murders, that of Jimmy Payne and Nathaniel Carter. This conviction led the police to conclude that Williams was also responsible for the deaths of a total of 29 young children and black individuals.…

Words 848 - Pages 4

485 Forensic Law Midterm Exam Essay

the first four modules of the course. 1. Explain why it is that evidence gained through the forensic science process is almost always considered to be circumstantial evidence. The most important fact that makes forensic evidence circumstantial is because science cannot be clearly defined by law. The legal system have created standards and written legal rules regarding the admissibility of forensic evidence. When forensic evidence that is presented in court is rarely unaccompanied by an expert…

Words 2763 - Pages 12