Wealth and Labor Essay

Submitted By catsmeowx3
Words: 913
Pages: 4
Open Document
Wealth and Labor
It is evident that the industrialization era revolutionized the United States into a wealthy and prosperous country. By the 1880s, America underwent profound economic development, and revolutionized itself from an agricultural state, to an industrial territory. With this transformation, a new working class was established, creating a distinct division between industrialists and laborers. Industrialist Andrew Carnegie, machinist John Morrison, and economist Henry George expressed their opinions of the modernization, sharing comparable and different opinions regarding the costs and benefits of industrialization.
Between the three men, it is evident they all agreed that the times had changed drastically, creating an efficient way of mechanization. Carnegie explained that before “articles were manufactured at the domestic hearth,” describing the master and apprentice relationship that had been practiced years before the industrial revolution. Carnegie then explained that the new form of trade “obtains commodities of excellent quality at prices which even the preceding generation would have deemed incredible.” Laborer John Morrison also expressed that the new trade was economical and prolific. Morrison stated, “…machinery is produced a great deal cheaper than it used to be formerly…100 men are able to do now what it took 300 or 400 men to do fifteen years ago.” Morrison’s perception of the production of capital goods compared to Carnegie’s; it is much cheaper and quicker than that of a small shop or household. Henry George also agreed that with the use of “steam and electricity” and “the introduction of improved processes and labor-saving machinery” industrialization had improved “the effectiveness of labor.”
Another comparable opinion the men shared included the social modification the new era conveyed. The new trade had created a vast distinction between the wealthy and the impoverished. Carnegie explained that the impact of industrialization created “rigid castes.” The castes separated the rich from poor. Carnegie was aware that the laborers were paid very little, which created “friction between the employer and the employed, the rich and the poor.” Morrison also expressed that the lower class was composed of factory laborers. When asked what social class he would categorize a workingman, he answered, “I now assign them to the lower class.” Morrison also stated that before the new trade was established, a workingman believed “he belonged in the middle class; but today he recognizes the fact he is simply the same as any other ordinary laborer, no more and no less.” The workers were paid so little; skilled or unskilled laborers were part of the lower class. Henry George agreed that the mechanization period separated the rich from the poor, creating a distinct difference in classes. George wrote that mechanization “simply widens the gulf between [the rich and the poor], and makes the struggle for existence more intense.” The three men all settled that the industrial revolution radically shaped the different social classes of its time.
For a laborer, the years before this industrial phenomenon might have been better times. In opposition, Carnegie wrote approvingly about the industrial revolution, stating that “the good old times were not good times at all.” The steel tycoon then continued, “Neither master nor servant was as well situated then as to-day.” Carnegie believed that the revolution brought forth better conditions and that reversing to previous circumstances would “sweep civilization with it.” In disagreement, Morrison recalled of better days for the workingman. He explained that the laborers lived a better life, and social pleasures were once practiced. “The
Show More

Related Documents: Wealth and Labor Essay

Civil Disobedience And Transcendentalism Analysis

Within the pages of his magnum opus, The Wealth of Nations, 18th century Scottish economic philosopher Adam Smith writes, “The labor of a menial servant. adds to the value of nothing.” (Smith, 187). He continues, “If any branch of trade, or any division of labor, be advantageous to the public, the freer and more general the competition, it will always be the more so.” (Smith, 185). Hailed as the forefather of capitalist thinking, Smith’s respect for free enterprise and disdain for state intervention…

Words 795 - Pages 4

Hot Seat 3 Essay example

The Encomienda and Hacienda systems were a fundamental part of life for the Spanish in Latin America. Wealth was distributed unevenly in Mexico during this time. The top social class consisted of People called Peninsulares. Peninsulares were given large grants of land to grow crops and raise cattle for trade. These grants of land were called Haciendas. The Haciendas included labor which consisted of the conquered peoples which were the Native Americans and Aztecs. These privileges however, were reserved…

Words 666 - Pages 3

Gilded Age Dbq Analysis

new immigrants and labor unions. Industrial developments led to monopolies, which helped men like Vanderbilt and Rockefeller prosper, but exploited the poor, often immigrant, workers who were willing to work for cheap money. Though the robber barons were a minority of the population, they still held a majority of the country’s wealth. This unequal distribution of wealth and poor working environments led to the formation and rise of labor unions, such as the Knights of Labor and the American Federation…

Words 1135 - Pages 5

How Did The Industrial Revolution Affect The Economy

fabric of society itself. Prior to the Industrial Revolution, America possessed a predominantly agrarian economy and generated wealth through the trade of tobacco, and resources such as lumber, minerals, fur and fish. England, rich in resources thanks to its colonial acquisitions, benefited from a series of technological breakthroughs to become…

Words 480 - Pages 2

Adam Smith and Karl Marx Essay

economic theory and philosophy can be greatly attributed to the works of two men who seemingly held polar opposite views on the subject. Adam Smith, a Scottish philosopher, published his most well known work An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations in 1776 and is most often associated with the ideas and principles of the political economic system known as Capitalism. At the other end of the spectrum is Karl Marx; the German philosopher most often associated with Communism and the…

Words 2044 - Pages 9

Marxist View of the Capitalistic Mode of Production and Exploitation Essay

ago. He demonstrates how the bourgeoisie take advantage of the labor power of the proletariat, creating profit and fueling the expansion necessary to keep profit margins at acceptable levels. Marx argues that this economic system, in which capital is the basis of wealth, sprung from the fall of feudalism when the means of production made obsolete the feudalistic relations of production, in which ownership of land was the basis of wealth. His claim, therefore, that capitalistic societies are exploitative…

Words 1099 - Pages 5

The Dehumanization Of Industry In Edward Bellamy's Looking Backward

society in his fiction, Bellamy criticized the capitalist institutions of his day that saw the enormous concentration of wealth in the hands of very few while the vast population of workers contributed all the labor to the development of wealth without just returns. In a complicated era of class frustrations and growing divides between the poor and the wealthy, both in their wealth and their culture, Bellamy captivated audiences with his novel, claiming that a reorganization of the systems of industry…

Words 783 - Pages 4

Thomas Piketty's Capital In The Twenty-21st Century

globally unequal economy due to inequality in the distribution of income and wealth which has existed for centuries. Of course, a couple of words cannot describe the entirety of Piketty’s novel; after all, it does consist of 700 pages of reading material. There are many other factors that Piketty touches base with, topics such as labor, taxes, technology, etc., which all played and continue to play a crucial role in how wealth and income are distributed today. Piketty has done a wonderful job bringing…

Words 7323 - Pages 30

Mesopotamia and Wealth Essay

earth’s earliest civilizations. They did not just start out with power and wealth. They did not have phones, internet access or robots to complete their work for them, while the peoples themselves rested idly by the fire. The peoples who resided in that area of Mesopotamia (which is present-day Iraq), worked hard and strived to even survive. They had to figure out on their own how to accumulate any power. The power and wealth that Mesopotamians had, had been earned by their writings and monumental…

Words 547 - Pages 3

The Gilded Age

monopolies. Railroad companies gained control of the government and the nation’s food and fuel supply. In The Labor Movement: The Problem of Today, George…

Words 925 - Pages 4