What Are The Pros And Cons Of Civil Disobedience

Words: 581
Pages: 3

When a group of people carry out an act of civil disobedience, their motive is never to resort to violence or cause harm to society, but simply to convey a symbolic message. It is done in order to resist government who have made certain laws or commands that they don’t agree with. Basically, civil disobedience is about taking a stand for what is felt to be right.
I believe that the pros of civil disobedience definitely outweigh the cons. In elementary school, the one act of peaceful resistance that I was most familiar with was the Civil Rights Movement lead by Martin Luther King Jr. Whether I was in class discussing historical and influential figures, or watching a documentary of his life on television with my family, I always felt quite moved by his story. I was inspired by the fact that his simple acts of resistance were strategically done in a nonviolent way, even though his enemies gave him every reason to turn physical and aggressive. He was still able to make a huge impact without choosing the other route. It proved that resorting to violence is not the only alternative to solving tough situations in life.
The North Dakota Pipeline Protest started off peaceful but eventually turned violent. Tear gas was sprayed, plastic
…show more content…
Six hundred and seventy three sister marches were held around the world for those who couldn’t make it to the one in Washington, and there were about four million nine hundred fifty-six thousand four hundred twenty-two marches. It was organized in order to aid in promoting the rights and equality in women and humans as a whole. This event came after Trump’s inauguration due to his offensive and misogynistic statements made during his campaign. It was definitely a harmonious and tranquil event that gave marchers a chance to get their message across. Hopefully, this international movement will bring about immense change in the