Why Animal Testing Is Inhumane?

Words: 1334
Pages: 6
Open Document
Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year (PETA). Because animals are living breathing creatures like us, it doesn't mean their body systems are anything like ours. Animals are a lot different than humans. You can’t expect the results of testing humans and animals to be the same. Animal testing has been a controversial topic for years, many will argue that it is inhumane or not beneficial to science. There are many pros and cons to animal testing, but in my opinion I believe it is wrong. Studies have shown that animal testing is inhumane, unsuccessful, and there is other alternatives that have been proven to be more effective. If studies show such a negative outcome from animal testing, it should …show more content…
“Animal testing is the use of animals in experiments and development projects usually to determine toxicity, dosing and efficacy of test drugs before proceeding to human clinical trials (Animal Testing).” Animals are tested on to help ensure the safety and effectiveness of anything from medications to our daily cosmetics before it hits consumer shelves. The animals being tested vary upon product, some may be bred specifically for testing others may be captured in the wild. Animals that are tested can range from small rodents, birds, fish, household pets, and even to farm animals. Animal testing happens all over the world but every country has different ways of regulating it because of the constant debate over is it right or …show more content…
Now it’s hard to find someone who wouldn’t agree on this, but they also say there is no other alternatives. This is very untrue. There are multiple testing methods that exist that can replace the need for animals. One highly common alternative is “organs-on-chips” which are human cells that mimic the structure and function of human cells and organ systems (Alternatives). These chips can be used instead of animal testing and have been proven to be more accurate than testing on animals. Another alternative that has been developed is computer modeling. Computer models can simulate human biology and show how certain diseases affect the body and help see how different drugs with react in a human body (Alternatives). There is also an option of micro dosing where humans can volunteer to take a very small dose of a drug and researchers can see how it behaves in the body. The last alternative methods we have is a Human-Patient Simulator, these simulators breath, bleed, convulse, talk, and even “die” (Alternatives). These simulators have been used to teach instead of using animals. There are even some high-tech simulators that mimic illnesses and injuries. “97% of medical schools across the U.S have completely replaced the use of animal laboratories in medical training with simulators like this
Show More

Related Documents: Why Animal Testing Is Inhumane?

Should Animal Testing Be Banned

Animal testing is a broad topic, some people agree with animal testing, then some people disagree with animal testing. Animal testing should be illegal. It is inhumane and unsafe for the animals and animal testing only profits big businesses. Why should we accept animal testing, how will it help us in the future? Animal testing has helped out with of medical and medication testing to see if everything will go how the medicine is supposed to go. The Huffington Post states that we should accept animal…

Words 459 - Pages 2

Animal Testing Is Inaccurate

Animal testing is inaccurate, a waste of time and money, and extremely inhumane. So, why do we continue to do it? First of all, it's inhumane and the results are often inaccurate. It also takes unnecessary time and money. It causes innocent animals to be lonely, fearful and in extreme pain. While some believe testing on animals finds us cures and helps save lives, that is incorrect, we have been able to cure cancer in mice for decades, yet people still die from it. This just proves that it is sadistic…

Words 569 - Pages 3

Effects Of Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

Animal Testing Argumentative Essay Have you ever wonder how animal testing effects animals? Animal testing is companies testing products on animals to see the affect of it, and if it is safe to use. Animal testing is mainly used with medicine use and cosmetic purposes. Animal testing should not be used because it cause extreme discomfort and pain to animals; also animal testing is very inhumane. First, animal testing should not be used because it causes extreme discomfort and pain to animals. “The…

Words 629 - Pages 3

Argument Against Animal Testing

these cures and processes are developed? They are partly developed through animal testing. Animal testing is a good way to help test substances and processes before humans use them. Human lives matter more than an animal's life. People eat meat like beef, pork, lamb, etc for food, so why do we care that animals are being used to help people and other animals with diseases and other problems? In a year 100 million animals are tested on and killed for the advancement and the protection of science…

Words 543 - Pages 3

Research Paper 2014

5 August 2014 Animal Testing: How long is enough? Time and time again the helpless mice are tortured, and forced to inhale toxic fumes. They’re thrown into barren cages with probably over twenty other mice; cramped, they begin to attack each other or take their own lives due to the high level of stress. Animal testing has been going on for centuries, but how long is enough? These animals are treated like nothing more than just disposable laboratory equipment and each year, over 100 million animals die in US…

Words 1210 - Pages 5

speech:animal experimentation Essays

AP Language and composition Period 2A Animal Rights and Experimentation I. Introduction: A. Professor Charles R. Magel once stated "Ask the experimenters why they Experiment on animals, and the answer Is: 'Because the animals are like us.' Ask the experimenters why it is morally OK to experiment on animals, and the answer is: 'Because the animals are not like us.' Animal experimentation rests on logical contradiction." 1. An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the united States…

Words 882 - Pages 4

Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

Animal testing is when an animal is forced to be in a test for a product that may be used on humans. There are many effects on the animals from the testing, some of them are fatal. This is what is happening everyday to innocent animals everyday, and there is nothing that the animals can do to stop it, they are completely helpless. When animals are used for testing, there are many different outcomes that could come from this, some of them better humans but do not better the animals, resulting in possible…

Words 1687 - Pages 7

Why Is Animal Testing Wrong

Is Animal Testing Wrong? Is animal testing a good and the right thing to do? No, animal testing is something bad and actually it isn’t the right thing to go. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane because animals suffer a lot when they are subjected to any type of tests. They would get burns and wounds while they are being tested. It is also wrong because animals and people are not the same, therefore, people don’t have the same reactions as animals. There are some reasons why animal testing…

Words 273 - Pages 2

Animal testing Essay examples

Animal Testing Testing on live animals should be illegal. This is because; testing on animals is harmful and inhumane, there are alternate test subjects rather than animals, and animals and humans are different, so the testing done may not actually prove safe on humans. Animals are not the only subjects that could be tested on for beauty products or cleaning products; there are other, and more humane ways to test products. For example, instead of testing a living being, try using a human…

Words 345 - Pages 2

Rhetorical Analysis Essay

“Should Animals Continue to Be Used in Research Experiments?” an article by Cynthia Barnett. It seems logical that animals would be used for testing rather than humans. The question is, why? Is it really necessary for animal’s to be used as “guinea pigs?” Burnett provides evidence of how far back in time experimental research has been tested on animals. She argues that the useful information obtained from these test could have been found through alternative testing. In the article she notes strong…

Words 716 - Pages 3