Why Is John Locke Innate Knowledge

Words: 977
Pages: 4

Between the beliefs of Descartes and Locke about ideas whether ideas are innate or perceived through experiences, they have many similarities and also many differences. Descartes believes strongly in innate ideas, meaning that our knowledge is given to us. Descartes claims and attempts to explain that we are born with all knowledge we believe that we obtain throughout our lifetime. While Locke doesn’t believes that our ideas our innate, he strongly believes that we learn and come up with ideas through life experiences. Descartes is convinced that all human beings are born with knowledge and ideas. He is confident in the fact that our perception of the world and everything we are surrounded by is too inconsistent and can cause blurred ideas. Due to this belief of perception being blurred and unclear, Descartes is convinced that we are incapable of trusting and following our perception. Locke feels and believes differently than Descartes, he believes that our knowledge and ideas are gained through life experiences, and there isn’t any such thing as innate ideas. Locke’s position in this belief is based off the fact that if innate ideas did exist, than children wouldn’t need to go to school to become educated that should already have …show more content…
One of Locke’s prime examples of why he believed he had factual proof and evidence to support his thesis against Descartes, he used the example of children. He analyzed how we have an education and a school system set up to education young children to give them knowledge to help thrive in their futures, but the point of this argument he was making the point to that we teach children to help expand their knowledge, but if we are required to teach children, since their minds are filled with much yet, then how could we believe in having innate ideas or