Why Is Julius Caesar Bad

Words: 751
Pages: 4

Greatness, even if they themselves don’t see it yet, is a gift given to those who are worthy. Such a propensity leads to power, and power always reveals a person’s true character to all. In fact, there was once a man given such attributes in his time. This man was Julius Caesar. Julius Caesar, a Roman general who fought bravely in the Gallic wars, won many conquests for Rome. However, after threatening Pompey’s position in government, Caesar, forced to resign from his position in the military, returned home. In October 49 BC, Caesar assumed power as a Roman dictator. Upon procuring such ascendancy, he created the Julian calendar and centralized the bureaucracy of the Republic. With his final term starting January 1, 44 BC and ending with his death on March 15, 44 BC, Caesar also served as part of the Consul of the Roman Republic three times, From this information, one can clearly adjudge that Julius Caesar was a man of many accomplishments. In other …show more content…
“Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” (Act III, scene ii, lines 23 - 24) Although Brutus came to claim that Caesar would have become an absolute ruler and would have made the citizens of Rome his slaves, this is merely speculation. Obviously Brutus had no means of seeing the future, making his entire cause to kill Caesar based on prediction and speculation. Without any way of knowing whether or not Caesar would become that kind of a ruler, Brutus lacked a strong reasoning for killing Caesar in the first place. In the lack true facts to back up his claim, many can easily mistake Brutus for a criminal who committed murder without reason instead of seeing him as an honorable man who merely did what he thought was best for his country. And as far as Caesar’s reign went, the citizens of Rome only saw goodwill and prosperity through his reign, not dictatorship and