Essay on WiFi a Thalidomide in the making wh

Submitted By mrelfe
Words: 4476
Pages: 18

2013

Humanity on the BRINK – Research Report from

Barrie Trower ‐ Frequencies that KILL . . . Barrie Trower September 2013
With Deference to all Scientists: this Research Report has been written for all students and non‐scientists to understand. 1

2013

Abstract
As stated by University Researchers,
Government Scientists and International
Scientific Advisors; a minimum of 57.7% of schoolgirls exposed to low‐level microwave radiation (Wi‐fi) are at risk of suffering stillbirth, foetal abnormalities or genetically damaged children, when they give birth. Any genetic damage may pass to successive generations. 2

3

2013

2013

Wifi – a Thalidomide in the Making – Who Cares?
Professor John R Goldsmith, International / Advisor Consultant for R.F. Communication,
Epidemiology and Communications Sciences Advisor to the World Health Organisation,
Military and University Advisor, Researcher; wrote concerning the low level exposure of microwave irradiation (below thermal level) incident upon women:
“Of the microwave‐exposed women, 47.7% had miscarriages prior to the 7th week of pregnancy....”(1) The level of irradiation incident upon the women was stated, as from, five microwatts per centimetre squared. This level of irradiation may seem meaningless to a non‐scientist; however, when I say that it is below what most schoolgirls will receive in a classroom of wi‐fi transmitters, from the age of approximately five years upwards, this level becomes more meaningful. A distinction here must be made and a very important one: schoolgirls are not women.
Schoolgirls are children and children are both neurologically and physiologically different from adults. A child’s brain tissue / bone marrow has different electrical conductivity properties than adults due to the higher water content (2) (this renders the Specific
Absorption Rate obsolete). Children’s absorption of microwave radiation can be ten times higher than adults. Permanent low‐level microwave exposure can induce chronic nitrosative and oxidative ‘stress’ thence, damage the cellular mitochondria
(mitochondropathy). This ‘stress’ can cause irreversible mitochondrial DNA damage
(mitochondrial DNA is ten times more susceptible to oxidative and nitrosative ‘stress’ than the DNA in the cell nucleus). Mitochondrial DNA is irreparable due to its low histone protein content, therefore any damage (genetic or otherwise) can be transmitted to all successive generations through the maternal line. (3)
Hence, we are subjecting each successive female generation to harm. Whether these two ten‐fold increases ‘merge’ to become 57.7% or are additional, thence equal 67.7% of those to suffer, is a moot point. Either way we are facing the equivalent of a pandemic. I was invited to present a lecture at Brighton University recently and one Doctor commented on a
+60% foetal birth rate damage from exposed farm animals. All mammalian species will of course suffer the same consequence resulting from low‐level microwave irradiation. There is very little difference ‘biologically’ between our embryonic cells.
I invite the Reader to peruse my diagram and / or read my simple explanation concerning the microwaving of the ovarian follicles in schoolgirls.
4

2013

Simple Explanation
Imagine you are five years old, in school and sitting with a wi‐fi laptop near your abdomen.
Theoretically, your ovaries can become irradiated until you leave school at aged 16‐18 years old. When you become pregnant, every one of your follicles (to become eggs) will have been microwaved. Hence, you may or may not deliver a healthy child.
Should you become a pregnant as a…