William Shakespeare Research Paper

William Shakespeare is most likely the greatest playwright, poet, and actor of all time, even with his own occasional pat on his own back in almost everything he wrote. The main stance for his greatness is that generations after his works have been written they still are used in schools and plays around the world. His stories of love, loss, humor, and death all have left an impact on the wonderful world of literature. Elizabethan era England was a time of prosperity both in the artistic world and economically, allowing for Shakespeare to work ever so diligently on his art. This time was also plagued with worry of what would happen to the country once Queen
Elizabeth dies. As a main focal point Shakespeare took a political stance in his plays …show more content…
A colossal problem with Cassius thinking this way is that Brutus is more powerful than
Cassius and if Brutus was just a pawn in Cassius’ plan then Cassius would be more powerful as the puppet master. Most of the mistakes made by the conspirators were made by Brutus and if
Cassius actually had dominance over Brutus, he wouldn’t have been able to devise any decisions in the first place. Making this exchange in authority complicated for Cassius to work with.
Consequently, after stating the Cassius believes himself superior to Brutus, Cassius quickly corrects himself stating “You wrong me every way ; you wrong me, Brutus./ I said, an elder soldier, not a better:/ Did I say better?”(Shakespeare 4.3.55-57). The two sides of Cassius are shown not even twenty lines apart, showing how much he is willing to go to ensure his pawn works towards his ideals to ameliorate Cassius’ plan. Yet again the problem with Cassius’ belief in his own control over Brutus’ is non existent and purely a figment of Cassius’ imagination. Cassius is absorbed in his own vanity to the point he cannot perceive that Brutus doesn’t need Cassius as much as Cassius needs Brutus. Making the dynamic the two characters have contradictory, ideals change …show more content…
Change cannot be bought without compromises or the end of something or someone. When hierarchy is in play numerous people crave for more power try to commit a coup to change the flow of power. Copious examples where the change of jurisdiction worked all happen at a cost of either lives or monetary value. Caesar, the tyrant he was, killed Pompey, the previous ruler of Rome, for power and allowing for himself to take over the country. Marullus was a man who spoke out against Caesar early on in the play
“Knew not of Pompey ...And do you now strew flowers in his way, That comes in triumph over
Pompey’s blood?’’(Shakespeare 1.1.38-53). The plebeians of Rome jump to whoever has authority, no matter the means, for a ruler, it is easy to win the people over. Once the ruler of a country is killed, then anyone below them slowly stay in place patient for their new ruler till a new rebel comes around. Caesar was one of these cases where the rebel obtained control just for his rain to be snuffed out before it could rise to its true potential. Julius Caesar was killed on the Ides of
March by some of his closest friends and allies who were trying to protect their own power.

Show More