Ladies and gentleman of the jury. I stand before you today oh behalf of my client Diana, who has been very poorly represented in newspaper articles throughout society. Specifically Woman's Day. This Woman's day article features Diana and Camilla and portrays Diana in a horrible, this positions the audience to view Diana as being an attempted ‘murderer’ rude, dramatic, ignorant, a bad mother and untrustworthy which is not true and proves articles such as this can not be trusted. However journalist --- has manipulatively used numerous amounts of codes and conventions to defame my client and to portray her in such a negative light towards the public. Now this is unjust. While I myself nor Diana can speak on behalf of you, we hope you have seen and understood the…show more content… Womans Day magazines has used bold headings and has gone as far to put “‘Diana has tried to ‘KILL ME’” in red, bold and in capital letters! This is an over exaggeration to capture the audience's attention into believing that Princess Diana is capable of such an act, this article says nothing about Diana trying to “KILL” anyone rather it attempts downgrades her status. Then more technical codes are used when various camera angles or Diana, Camilla and Charles as plastered all over the page! There's the first picture shot or my client Diana which positions the audience to believe and see Diana as arrogant or unimpressed person and captions under it “Diana would phone Camilla in the middle of the night with threatening messages. Camilla’s bibliography”, This is taken it way out of perspective, and claiming form Camilla’s bibliography? Really how could you trust this when this is only one side of the story! This is silencing my clients voice let hers be
