Adversarial System: The Criminal Justice System In Australia

Words: 696
Pages: 3

The criminal justice system in Australia is based on an adversarial system of law. It consists of two opposing sides, each presenting their case to an impartial judge or jury. In criminal law, the adversary system pits the prosecution against the accused, who will usually be represented by a solicitor or barrister who provides legal advice and presents the case in court. The judge, or jury in indictable offences, acts as an impartial observer who determines the accused’s guilt or innocence based on the evidence and arguments presented. The prosecutors, either police or public prosecutors represents the state or ‘Crown’ whose role is to prosecute the offender in a court of law and obtain an appropriate form of sanction or punishment for the offence. An alternative to the adversarial is the inquisitorial system. This is a system of law in which a judge or group of judges plays a role in investigating the case or calling for evidence or testimony that has not been …show more content…
An essential element in ensuring a fair trial is the ability of the defendant to access legal representation. Without this, the defendant is severely disadvantaged, due to a lack of knowledge of the law and a lack of understanding of the criminal trial process. The High Court recognised this in a 1992 decision Dietrich v The Queen, which for the first time established a limited right to legal representation in Australia, where Justices Mason CJ and McHugh J said “…by reason of the lack of representation of the accused, the resulting trial is not a fair one…for the reason that there has been a miscarriage of justice in that the defendant has been convicted without a fair trial.” However, the right to legal representation as a result of this case was only established for serious crimes, enshrined in Article 14(3)(d) of the