American Historiography Summary

Words: 906
Pages: 4

American historiography the interwar period is characterized by an increased interest in the situation in Germany. At this time there a number of activities designed to draw public attention to the Nazi threat. The most significant works of this period are the works of K. Bilse, which raised the problem of the Nazi threat [1; 2]. According to this author, the US was the only way to stop further strengthening of Germany in the world – to adopt her methods, abandoning the program of the state Department on the liberalization of international trade.
Position K. Bilse was not dominant in American historiography. For example,Percy Bidwell argued that the Nazi threat was largely exaggerated by the Roosevelt administration on domestic and foreign political reasons [3]. For Bidwell, it was obvious that a real military threat from Berlin to US security in the 1930s did not exist and the American government intentionally exaggerated the danger. He
…show more content…
brown [7]. Attacking the decisions of the Yalta and Potsdam conferences, which allegedly led to political instability and economic difficulties in Germany, American journalist sharply criticized also the decision of the allies on the question of punishment of war criminals.
However, in the literature of the United States as the approval and protection of the principles of Nuremberg are many historians who belong to the so-called school of "political idealism". They are of the opinion that the determining factor in international relations should not be force, but conscience, morality and reason. These historians believe that military conflicts can be prevented with the help of international organizations and treaties. "Political idealists" look at the Nuremberg trials as a symbol of constructive efforts to achieve law and order and a stable world