An Angry God Argument

Words: 447
Pages: 2

When Jonathan Edwards wrote the sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” in 1741, he depicted God as an archer aiming an arrow at each human. Edwards argued that those who do not attend church and do not believe in God will suffer as they burn in hell and God will not vouch for them. While those who do attend church and are believers will be glorified. This sermon was written in response to the ones who tried to convert people to the Church of England. Edwards was enraged that they were trying to convert to another religion, and noticed that it was pursuing wealth rather than religious principles. As he grew fury he delivered his sermon in public and this opened everyone’s minds and this became known as the Great Awakening. After hearing …show more content…
His intention is to try to frighten everyone into believing in God and attending church. Edwards claims that sinners will rot in hell and God will do nothing to save them from the flames of hell in order to persuade his audience to go to church and believe in God, to not be a sinner. Nothing good comes from being a sinner, only good comes from believing in God and attending church. According to Biography.com, Jonathan Edwards helped shape the course of protestant theology with his sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” and became well known for it. His sermon helped develop the idea of free will and firm confidence in God's righteousness. In the sermon, he implored people to embrace the teaching of God before being rebuked by hell. Based on the author’s use of diction and imagery, his tone can best be described as angry and contemptuous. This is because of the way he uses imagery to vividly describe hell and what life is without Gods presence. Edwards uses diction as well to help prove the point that God will not take sinners into