If fear is the most effective way to garner attention, it does not make sense to attribute inaction to fear because the removal of fear would undoubtedly cause inaction by way of preventing any interest in a given topic. They even state that perhaps the “apocalyptic warning” was the only “way to sound the alarm about the devastating threat presented by global climate change…” If hyperbolic rhetoric was the only way to draw attention to the issue, it would be ridiculous to blame that same extreme rhetoric with inaction toward the issue. Surely removing the cause of interest in anything cannot be attributed with causing disinterest toward that same