Arguments Against Life Support

Words: 1508

Pages: 7

Open Document

Life support is equipment that is used by doctors to help maintain a person’s function of their vital organs. This is usually used for people in comas or a person who is critically ill. Life support does not better someone’s life. It just helps maintain it. The person is still breathing but is not mentally and physically there. Life support takes over the organs for a short period of time, but for dying people it can be harmful to their bodies which can make them suffer. In discussions of life, support one controversial issue has been if dying people should be kept on life support. My own view is that dying people should be left to die in peace with dignity. The person has suffered enough, and shouldn’t be put through more pain.
When the doctors see that all hope is lost in a patient, then they encourage the patient's family to end the patient's suffering and disconnect them. On life support the patient is only suffering unconscious and is not in control of their mind or body. Their organs are not functioning and will not get any better just worse with time. Just keeping them on life support is putting off the natural process of death and making it even more difficult for the families. These situations are hard for …show more content…
I believe that letting go is a selfless act that all families should contemplate how considerably better it is for the patient’s well-being. Some families are selfish and are not really discerning of the person and what he or she is going through. According to Deborah Cook “In the context of end-of-life decision-making, clinicians use technology to orchestrate the "best" death possible for critically ill patients under difficult circumstances. This goal is concerned less with health outcomes in the traditional sense than it is with the aesthetic, ethical and social experiences of those involved in the patient's care” (1). Cooks point is

Benjamin Banneker Declaration Of Independence Rhetorical Analysis

Benjamin Banneker. Banneker wrote a letter to Thomas Jefferson, the framer of the Declaration of Independence arguing against slavery. In his letter he uses many rhetorical devices to support his argument against slavery. Some of the strategies included the use of metonymy, holy war, last resort, and bandwagon. All of these devices contributed to a stronger argument for Banneker to argue against Jefferson’s idea of slavery. The author uses a metonymy when he refers to the British King. “Sir, suffer me to…

Words 459 - Pages 2

Essay on Doctor: Cord Stem Cells

Arguments against research Embryonic stem cell research has been in the controversial focus for many years and has gathered a lot of opposition to stem cell research from the public and religious groups. One of the other important arguments against stem cells research is that there has been virtually no real successful cure or even a potential for cure found to support destroying the beginning of life, there's no evidence that a destroyed human embryo will help someone. Stem cells for research…

Words 348 - Pages 2

Definition Of Against Work

article “Against Work”. Consequently, in this paper, there are plenty of definitions of the article “Against Work” will be described as follows. To begin with, the article “Against Work” was wrote by Christopher Clausen, according to the topic, it quite obvious that the content of the article is concerned with the idea of not working. Consequently, the author utilizes a number of examples, describing the reason,…

Words 1240 - Pages 5

Analysis of Arguments Against Id Essay

E142W Analysis of the Arguments against Intelligent Design Ayala argues that intelligent design is not a scientific theory. His first premise deals with the fact that scientific theories must be falsifiable, and his second premise deals with the false dichotomy of evolution and intelligent design. While his arguments are logically valid, an objection that could be made about his argument is his definition of intelligent design. One of the premises of Ayala’s argument is that for a theory to…

Words 972 - Pages 4

Fallacy and Samsung Galaxy s 3 Essay

Logic Weak/Fallacy : IPhone is a phone like Samsung galaxy s3. Galaxy s3 has android, therefore iPhone has android. Ambiguity (Equivocation): Using a term in multiple meanings are used in one argument. Ex: A feather is light. Light is not dark and so a feather is not dark. Red Herring: Distracts the arguer by introducing a new topic. Sweeping generalizations: Applying a general rule to a statement where some parts do not apply. Ex: Children should be seen and not heard. Since little Wolfgang…

Words 343 - Pages 2

Marquis Argument On Abortion

I agree with Marquis’ argument and believe that abortion is immoral. Like other human beings, fetuses have the right to live their lives and that right should never be taken from anyone, especially if they do not have a decision on what happens in their life. Even though a woman might get an abortion because she is not ready for a child at that moment, there is the possibility that the child could lead a successful life. Marquis’ stance on abortion is that it is morally wrong to do so because it…

Words 985 - Pages 4

Similarities Between I Have A Dream And Atticus Finch

similarities. Martin Luther King and Atticus Finch had different life experiences, lived in different times, and knew different people; regardless, they wrote speeches that were very similar in topic and delivery. Both speeches utilized the prejudice of the times, the potential of the judicial system, and American beliefs in order to support their cases. By using these three things in conjunction, they were both able to make and support their arguments. The times that Martin Luther King and Atticus Finch lived…

Words 561 - Pages 3

Consalvo's Argument Is Vastly Weak

of video games and the internet, her argument was vastly weak. Consalvo made the claim that video games, specifically one called “Doom”, had no effect on Harris and Klebold. In this section she give a very strong counter-argument. Which, normally would be beneficial to include, unfortunately in Consalvos case, the counter-argument was stronger than her own. Her claim was weak for 6 main reasons. To start, it is a great deal smaller than the rest of the arguments she makes throughout the article. After…

Words 1242 - Pages 5

Cloning: Cloning and ‘reproductive Cloning Essay

Cloning opens up a whole new world of biological science allowing scientists to be able to help people like never before. One of the many uses of reproductive cloning is that it allows infertile couples to have biologically related children (“Arguments for ‘Reproductive Cloning’”, para. 6). Reproductive cloning allows reproduction to happen regardless of circumstances; it basically enables same-sex couples along with single parents to have children. Reproductive freedom and choice are expanded…

Words 1920 - Pages 8

What is wrong with adultery Essay

degree due to the attitudes changing toward sex and sexuality, but Steinbock thinks that people should use rational justification to evaluate the disapproval of adultery. Then in the rest of the parts of Steinbock’s essay, she is generally arguing against adultery based on the plausible claim that our views toward adultery are varied, and these views are bound to be connected to important conventions about marriage, fidelity, romantic love ( Romeo and Juliet’s case ), the…

Words 1699 - Pages 7