Asoka Dbq Analysis

Words: 461
Pages: 2

Do you think Asoka was a ruthless conqueror or not? Asoka led a lavish lifestyle full of expensive tastes, and many laws made by him. Asoka was a ruthless conqueror because he took over other lands which were not his, also he also killed many people from the other land just to take over and make it his land instead, he also showed that if there were more enemies he would of ruthlessly fought them too. Asoka should be recognized as a ruthless leader because he conquered land that wasn't his.. “Kalinga was conquered in the ninth year of Asoka's reign. After this conquest, Asoka ceased to indulge in wars of aggression.”(Doc B) This shows that Asoka was a ruthless conqueror because he took over land that wasn’t his, and he was taking over other people's homeland to make his grow larger than it already was. This shows that Asoka is a …show more content…
“Asoka ceased to indulge in wars of aggression. This… was not because he completely forsook the idea of war as a means to an end, though he claims to have done so, but because with the conquest of Kalinga the consolidation of the empire was complete. Furthermore there was now no opposing power within the empire.”(Doc B) This shows that he only stopped fighting because there were no more enemies, not because he was enlightened. This shows that Asoka was a ruthless conqueror not an enlightened ruler.

Asoka was a ruthless conqueror because he took over other lands which were not his, also he also killed many people from the other land just to take over and make it his land instead, he also showed that if there were more enemies he would of ruthlessly fought them too. Just because Asoka changed his ways, told everyone he was enlightened, and said he was sorry doesn’t take back the fact that he ruined hundreds of thousands of lives. So in my opinion and because of all the reasons listed, in conclusion he is a ruthless