Carl Sandburg’s use of proper and concrete nouns allow readers to grasp the subject and location of the poem. With the addition of specific …show more content…
The pronoun “I,” seen in lines 3 and 10, give recognition and presence to the grass. Instead of forming the tone from a human’s perspective, it is now seen through the eyes of nature. In fact, the grass seems to take on a human-like persona. The personification of grass acts as a metaphor for how humans are treated during war. By dedicating subject to the “grass,” readers are able to sense the irritated and dismissive tone throughout the text. A somber tone also becomes present as humans shovel bountiful bodies beneath the earth’s surface disrupting and mistaking Mother Nature as a garbage. It becomes clear that the grass feels inferior to humans as history and significance of war is forgotten underneath nature’s outer shell. As a result of nature providing tone for the text, readers are able to digest the poem through a different point of view.
In conclusion, Sandburg gives the reader’s a vision of brutality through nature’s point of view. By including various verbs, nouns, and pronouns into each syntax, readers are better able to understand the poem and its message. Carl Sandburg uses various acts of speech such as, stative and imperative verbs, proper and concrete nouns, and first and third person pronouns to create a vivid image of the effect war has on Mother Nature. Readers end the poem with an understanding of war’s past and it’s somber and mournful