Case Study: Burwell V. Hobby

Words: 1133
Pages: 5

Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc.

Hobby Lobby is an arts and crafts retail store that was founded in 1972 by David Green. The store began with 300 square feet and now there are over 600 stores and thousands of employees in the chain. The chain is still owned and operated by the Green Family. (5) The members of the Green family are devout Evangelical Christians. (2) The owners of Hobby Lobby strongly believe that life begins at conception. They believe than any form of birth control that may destroy a fertilized egg is equivalent to abortion, which they are also against, as killing goes against their faith. To put it into medical terms, pregnancy begins only when a fertilized egg attaches to the uterine wall. Some anti-abortion groups and
…show more content…
This includes the copper IUD, an IUD with progestin, Plan B, and Ella. Copper IUDs interfere with the transportation of sperm and could also prevent an already fertilized egg from being implanted. IUDs with progestin may do many things, including preventing implantation of a fertilized egg by altering the endometrium. Plan B is an emergency contraceptive pill that also alters the endometrium, preventing implantation of the egg. Ella is another pill that prevents/delays ovulation and may also alter the endometrium to prevent implantation. (1) The Greens did not object to any other forms of birth control, such as daily birth-control pills. Apparently, there are some religious people who own businesses that do not want to provide any type of birth control for their employees. Hobby Lobby is fortunately not one of these companies. This is an even more controversial topic because allowing companies to say they do not want to provide ANY contraceptives would require the government or another third party not involved with the employer to help pay for certain types of birth control.