Case Study: Citizens United V. Federal Election Commission

Words: 618
Pages: 3

One duty of the FEC includes overseeing disclosure of campaign finance information and public funding of presidential elections and enforcing contribution limits. An example of this task can be found during the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) which overturned part of the 2002 law that had prohibited corporate and union funding of campaign ads.
The Federal Election Campaign can enforce its finance laws through The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 which states
Political Action Committees mostly represent businesses, labor or ideological interests. PACs can give $5,000 to a candidate committee per election (primary, general or special). PACs may receive up to $5,000 from any one individual. PACs are treated as one donor for contribution limits. This can impact an election depending on how many PACs are helping a particular candidate. In addition to PACs, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) impacts campaign finance policy.T his case overturned part of the 2002 law that had prohibited corporate and union funding of campaign ads. This impacted the finance policy because it gave PACs more power.
…show more content…
Who has the right to tell someone what they can and cannot do with the money they earned working. If that person's taxes have been paid, they should be allowed to donate any amount of money to the presidency. The only problem with this is that it might make the presidential election about who can raise more money. A simple way of avoiding this issue is by setting a limit for the presidential candidate. Tell the candidate that they can only use a maximum of 10,000,000 for example. If both candidates raise the exact amount of money, then it is fair for both parties, and you will not have the problem of setting more laws against the