Cause In Fact And Proximate Cause

Words: 355

Pages: 2

Cause in fact and proximate cause are parts of negligence suits, both cause in fact and proximate cause must be proven in order for the case to be won and to show there was actual negligence.Negligence is not taking the proper care in a situation which caused an injury.Many negligence cases occur everyday wether its for speeding or DUI’s, negligence happens very often and this can cause injury to a person or people.When this occurs a person goes to the law for a solution to their pain and suffering. Cause in fact and proximate cause was created so that people would need more evidence in order to make someone liable for what happened to them.These two factors are used to make a final decision on what the person is sueing you for.If these

Show More

Courtroom Observation Paper

excess was not the “proximate cause” of the injuries to the plaintiff or the death of her husband. They would have to prove that Mr. Daniels had no knowledge that Mr. Hard was visibly intoxicated at the time Mr. Daniels served him his last drink. The plaintiff would have to prove that Mr. Daniels “did have” actual knowledge that Mr. Hard was intoxicated and that his actions as a result of being intoxicated were “foreseeable” and that the actions of Mr. Hard were the proximate cause of same. In…

Words 2714 - Pages 11

Four Elements Of Negligence

prudent person would exercise in like circumstances. The area of tort law known as negligence involves harm caused by carelessness of another.” According to Elements of a Negligence Case “injury.findlaw.com, “when someone acts in a careless way and causes an injury to another person, under the legal principle of ‘negligence’ the careless person will be legally liable for any resulting harm. “ When an injured person (plaintiff) believes that his or her injury was caused by the carelessness of another…

Words 1605 - Pages 7

Disobedience In The 1920's

decided it was time to take matters into their own hands. A prime example of proximate disobedience : they were affected by it at the place they took action and at the time at which they took action. Not only was the situation current, but French citizens also put forth a plan, they clearly identified what was making them unhappy (the cause of their revolution) and then came up with a solution that addressed the cause of their…

Words 661 - Pages 3

Hw 1 Essay

Part 1 of 6 - Human food choices Observation: Modern humans consume large amounts of candy and sugary soft drinks, despite the fact that there are clear negative consequences to this behavior, such as tooth decay and obesity. Question: Why do modern humans consume these foods? The following are hypotheses that represent possible answers to this question. Each one best fits into the category of one of Tinbergen's four questions. For each, indicate which of Tinbergen's questions it is about by typing…

Words 1526 - Pages 7

Steve Simple Negligence Case

salaries) and was something that had happened before (although only pigeons had been fried in the past). Negligence is when someone acts in a careless way and causes another individual to get injured. Under this law, negligence cases must demonstration the defendant’s carelessness caused harm to the plaintiff. Even if negligence is…

Words 805 - Pages 4

Courtroom Observation

intoxicated patron is still the proximate cause of an injury if the injury is a natural or probable consequence which in light of the circumstance should have been foreseeable. Basically served to Intoxification and patron does an intentional act that the server/bar would have foreseen it.. The plaintiff ask this court to not allow that the motion summary of judgment to go forward and not grant it as, Mr. Hard has the reputation of driving while drunk ,would cause a car accident when served beyond…

Words 1771 - Pages 8

Tom And Sand Transportation Case Summary

. Jill has legal sufficient jurisdictional grounds over both Tom and Sand Transportation. To begin, Jill has jurisdictional grounds over both Tom and Sand Transpiration because of sufficient minimum contact Tom, an employee of Sand Transportation, had in the state of Pennsylvania while driving to his destination. The long arm statues make it possible for PA to obtain in personam jurisdiction over Tom even if he has left the state. 2.Tom and Sand Transportation are able to move this case to the federal…

Words 811 - Pages 4

Torts Outline Essay

Torts Outline #1 Thomas Goodwyn 30 November 2012 INTENTIONAL TORTS TO PLAINTIFF’S PERSON Battery – § 18(1) Intentionally (2) harmful or offensive contact (3) causation Harmful contact – causes physical damage or injury Offensive contact – it offends a reasonable sense of personal dignity Physical Contact to person isn’t required Anything connected to the P’s person is viewed as part of the P’s person Morgan v. Loyacomo alleged shoplifter- contact with P’s body not required=L Leichtman v. Madden…

Words 5000 - Pages 20

Case Reference: Middlesex County Case

Ebook Chapter 2 Legal Issues: Specific questions raised by the facts. "Slip and fall" is a term used for a personal injury case in which a person slips or trips and is injured on someone else's property. In most cases, a person injured in a slip and fall on someone else's property must prove that the cause of the accident was a "dangerous condition," and that the owner or possessor of the property knew of the dangerous condition. Cause of action: negligence. ANNA LOCACIO,…

Words 208 - Pages 1

SGT Alvarez Case Summary

b. RESPONSIBILITY: Facts proves that SGT Alvarez was signed for the two computers at the time of the loss. Therefore, SGT Alvarez had direct responsibility as a sub-hand receipt (SHR) holder to ensure sufficient custodial care and accountability were established, enforced and executed (refer, AR 735-5 para 4, pg. 80). SGT Alvarez’s action proves that he failed to maintain custodial property accountability and substantiates personal negligence. c. CULPABILITY: SGT Alvarez showed simple negligence…

Words 172 - Pages 1