Citation and Valid Academic Sources Essay

Submitted By courtney89
Words: 762
Pages: 4

Marking Criteria: Written Reflection Assignment NUR341

|Student Name: Student Number: Marker: |
|Assessment Criteria |Pass |Fail |
| | | |
| |7 |6 |5 |4 |3 2 1 |
|Clarity and analysis of |In your assignment you have: |In your assignment you have: |In your assignment you have: |In your assignment you have: |In your assignment you have: |
|journal article | | | | | |
|(Demonstrate a very |demonstrated clear links between the |demonstrated links between the evidence|mostly demonstrated links between the |sometimes demonstrated links between the |your paper did not have an introduction, |
|thorough understanding of |evidence provided and the selected |provided and the selected topic |evidence provided and the topic |evidence provided and the topic |body and conclusion that were focused on |
|the |topic |your paper had an articulate |your paper had a fairly articulate |your paper attempted to have an |the topic |
|article that you have |your paper had an articulate |introduction with a framework, a body |introduction, body and conclusion that |introduction, body and conclusion that were|it was difficult to discern a logical flow |
|chosen) |introduction with framework, a body and|and conclusion that were focused on the|were generally focused on the topic |focused on the topic but sometimes went |of ideas throughout the whole paper as well|
| |conclusion that were focused on the |topic. |there was a fairly logical flow of |“off track” and sometimes the discussion |as within and between each paragraph. |
| |topic. |there was mostly a logical flow of |ideas throughout the whole paper as |began without an introduction and finished |your discussion was not always relevant to |
|10 marks |there was a logical flow of ideas |ideas throughout the whole paper as |well as within and between each |abruptly without a conclusion |the topic |
| |throughout the whole paper as well as |well as within and between each |paragraph but the link with the topic |there was poor or little logical flow of | |
| |within and between each paragraph |paragraph |was not always clear |ideas throughout the whole paper as well as| |
| | | |