David Foster Wallace's 'Consider The Lobster'

Words: 751
Pages: 4

Human animals kill other animals for many reasons, such as pleasure, traditions, or necessity. People practice different actives to kill animals such as hunting, boiling, and many others. Many festivals, such as the Maine Lobster Festival stated by Wallace, are held around the world where it is part of the people's culture to kill different animals mostly for their gustatory pleasure. Before animals are eaten, they almost always experience confinement, fear, pain, and of course death which makes it unethical to kill animals. In the article "Consider the Lobster", the author David Foster Wallace attempts to point that the process of cooking lobsters while boiling them is immoral due to the fact that they may feel pain just as much as humans do. He is clearly concerned about the ethics go boiling a creature alive. In the article "Three educational problems: the case of eating animals" written by Suzanne Rice, it is stated that in most of the modern world, humans do not have to eat other animals in order to be healthy. The article "Why should our students study animal behavior?" written by Patricia Grove, proves the importance of animals in sustainable agriculture. Animals are sentient beings that have social connections. In the words of Patricia Grove, "the line between the behaviors of humans …show more content…
"They can increase efficiency by their ability to transform materials unsuitable for human consumption and by grazing areas hat would be difficult to harvest otherwise", says Grove. This sentence demonstrates that animals help us in our daily lives, therefore we, humans, should not make them experience pain and or death when they are in our favor, with some exceptions. In the point of view of Grove, "objections against animal agriculture often refer to the disrespect for animals' lives, integrity, and welfare in present intensive animal production systems". It is inevitable to kill animals if the system is to deliver animal