David Williams Right To Bear Arms

Words: 507
Pages: 3

Every citizen in the United States has his or her understanding of the second amendment. The vague structure in which the amendment is written in facilitates the uncommon understanding of who can own a gun and in which circumstances. It states that” A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” In this moment where gun violence has increased, people have stood to what they think the amendment means to their freedom and rights, and how it should or should not be disturbed. David C. William grouped all these different understandings in three myths as he calls them, and these myths touch every understanding of the amendment. In Denver on November 1, 2017, a 47 years old man entered Wal-Mart and shot three people who were in a line. This one of the cases where a person owning a gun randomly shot people. Williams advocates for the third myth to be nationally implemented through many ways, but it also comes with a question of its attainability in a historical reliable and insecure American society. …show more content…
In this myth he explores the ideas of people who understand the second amendment as a right to own gun for self-defense against robbery. However, statistics prove that in majority of incidents, no gun was used for self-defense even though the victims reportedly owned gun(s). In the Wal-Mart shooting, Chicago Tribune reports that there were customers with guns at hand, but that they failed to stop the shooter. They only hindered the investigation when the police had to identify the suspect while watching videos of the incident. The myth that a person can own a gun for self-defense does not correlate with human emotions when put in a risky and traumatizing