Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case Analysis

Words: 520
Pages: 3
Open Document
Preceding 1861 the South was convinced slavery was in trouble, and their lifestyle was debilitated. The South's reliance on slavery and the racial hierarchy it created, constrained a partition between the North and South. The North supported Abraham Lincoln, a member of the Republican Party, and was against the development of slavery. The Republican Party was established in 1854 by previous Whigs and other small parties. The Party was devoted to ceasing the spread of slavery.

Slavery had to a great extent vanished from the North by early 1800, while it was winding up more well known in the South. The interest for cotton developed as the textile industry was growing in Britain and the Northeast. Therefore, the Southern economy was extending and developing. The Souths reliance on slavery to produce cotton enabled plantation owners to accept all benefits. From now on, when Abraham Lincoln was elected …show more content…
The Dred Scott versus Sanford case constrained numerous Northerners to the conclusion that slavery could either be restricted everywhere or not at all. Dred Scott was a slave who was brought to a free state by his owner. After living in a free state for a few years his lawyers believed he merited his freedom. The Supreme Court Chief clarified Dred Scott did not have a case since he is considered property, not a person. The choice angered numerous and enlarged the divide. Another critical occasion was the Kansas Nebraska Act which split the Nebraska territory into two. This made physical brutality break out between Northerners and Southerners living in Kansas. At last, the Compromise of 1850 restricted the slave trade in Washington D.C., this enabled California to end up noticeably a free state and made Texas a slave state. These occasions alongside numerous others persuaded the Southern political leaders they were under attack by the
Show More

Related Documents: Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case Analysis

Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case Analysis

Multiple cases overtime have caused power to fluctuate between federal and state government. Dred Scott V. Sanford and McCulloch V. Maryland are two cases that the supreme court faced and ruled in favor of the federal government causing the power to shift towards the federal government. In Dred Scott V. Sanford, Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri for 10 years before going to Illinois which was a free state, and then going back to Missouri claiming to be a free man because he had lived in Illinois…

Words 601 - Pages 3

Abortion and Human Life Essay

reasons why abortion is frowned upon by many societies in the world including religious objections, ethical considerations and legal constraints. There has been a raging debate about abortion in the United States ever since the Supreme Court decided Roe vs Wade in 1973 and many facets of the debate have been exposed. Abortion has been decried as an extension of the patriarchy’s continued denial of women’s freedoms as feminists have argued that it is up to a woman to decide whether or not to be a mother…

Words 3189 - Pages 13