Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case Analysis

Words: 601
Pages: 3
Open Document
Multiple cases overtime have caused power to fluctuate between federal and state government. Dred Scott V. Sanford and McCulloch V. Maryland are two cases that the supreme court faced and ruled in favor of the federal government causing the power to shift towards the federal government. In Dred Scott V. Sanford, Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri for 10 years before going to Illinois which was a free state, and then going back to Missouri claiming to be a free man because he had lived in Illinois. Sanford, his master, claimed that anyone of African American descent or a descendent of a slave could be a civilian in the sense of Article III of the Constitution. The problem that the Supreme Court was having to solve was whether Dred Scott was a free man or a slave. The Supreme Court’s ruling was seven to two in Sanfords favor. Roger Brooke Taney was the one to explain the reasoning behind the ruling, what he had to say was that under Articles III and IV no one but a citizen of the United States could be a citizen of a state. He also said that only Congress can grant citizenship, then reached the conclusion that no one descended from an American slave has ever been a citizen because of Article III. Supreme court decided that the missouri …show more content…
Maryland Congress chartered The Second Bank of the US in 1816, then in 1818 Maryland attempted to impose taxes on the Bank. The problems brought forth in this case was if Congress had the authority to establish the bank, and if Maryland unconstitutionally interfere with congressional powers. There was a unanimous decision that Congress had the power to establish the bank even if wasn’t outlined in the constitution. They also decided that Maryland may not impose a tax on the bank, or any other federal instruments or congressional powers.This case let people know the extent of congress's power isn’t explicitly said in the constitution and showed that the State government can’t tax any federal
Show More

Related Documents: Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case Analysis

Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case Analysis

The Dred Scott versus Sanford case constrained numerous Northerners to the conclusion that slavery could either be restricted everywhere or not at all. Dred Scott was a slave who was brought to a free state by his owner. After living in a free state for a few years his lawyers believed he merited his freedom. The Supreme Court Chief clarified Dred Scott did not have a case since he is considered property, not a person. The choice angered…

Words 520 - Pages 3

Abortion and Human Life Essay

reasons why abortion is frowned upon by many societies in the world including religious objections, ethical considerations and legal constraints. There has been a raging debate about abortion in the United States ever since the Supreme Court decided Roe vs Wade in 1973 and many facets of the debate have been exposed. Abortion has been decried as an extension of the patriarchy’s continued denial of women’s freedoms as feminists have argued that it is up to a woman to decide whether or not to be a mother…

Words 3189 - Pages 13