End Justifies The Means

Words: 965
Pages: 4

The good of many is more important than the good of one. This ideology has been adopted through countless generations and has been put into effect by numerous leaders. The greater good is a common phrase used to describe this philosophy. The good of many is more important than the good of one because it promotes diversity, protects the human race, and ensures competition. The definition of diversity is: the condition of having or being composed of differing elements, or the inclusion of different types of people in a group or organization (Merriam-Webster). Throughout the history of the world this principle has been a difficult concept for the population to grasp. However, in more recent generations it has become more commonly accepted. The viewpoint, the good of many …show more content…
This phrase means that a good outcome excuses any wrongs committed to attain it (The Definition of End Justifies the Means). If something is wrong or illegal that sacrifices the life, wants, or needs, of one person or a small group must be done to guarantee the lives, wants, or needs, of the majority, it is necessary to do. A better, less devastating, outcome excuses the wrong things done to achieve it. Those who challenge, the good of many is more important than the good of one, argue that the ends does not justify the means. They say that the ends cannot justify the means because, there will never truly be an end, nothing ever completely ends (The Myth of the Greater Good). The repercussions will continually keep coming and never stop. They may be correct in the fact that in every situation there is usually no complete end. However, we cannot constantly fear the future, fate is unavoidable. If the correct thing to do is right in front of our eyes we must do it while the chance is available. Perhaps if the current situational offer is not pursued, the condition could most likely get