Fare V. Michael C. Case Summary

Words: 808
Pages: 4

In the case of Fare v Michael C., we find that the respondent Michael C, then a 16 ½-year-old habitual juvenile offender who was then on probation for previous offenses, was brought in for questioning by police under suspicion of committing murder. The respondent’s relationship with the judicial system is said to have begun at the age of 12 and consisting of charges ranging from burglary of guns to purse snatching which ultimately resulted in the respondent serving time in a juvenile corrections camp and being placed on probation by the Juvenile Court prior to the offense in question of murder.
During the initiation of the custodial interrogation of the respondent, the investigating officers advised the Michael C. of his Miranda Rights and asked if he would like to have an attorney present during the questioning process. Michael C. advised the officers of his desire to have his probation officer present but did not request the presence of a parent or attorney. As indicated via the recorded interview transcript, the officers advised the respondent that they would not be able to contact the probation
…show more content…
The Court’s assertion that the probation officer was a person of authority / parens patriae and therefore holds “a position as a trusted guardian figure in a juvenile's life that would make it normal for the juvenile to turn to the officer when apprehended by the police, and was also based on the state law requirement that the officer represent the juvenile's interests”. Additionally, the court asserted that because the state had failed to meet its burden of proving the request did not proclaim the respondent’s invocation of his Fifth Amendment privilege, the evidence should not have been