Forensic Anthropology Case

Words: 1083
Pages: 5

Question 1
What was the role of the Forensic Anthropologist in this presented case?
Typically, forensic anthropologists work with any kind of law enforcement agency in the process of finding and interpreting skeletal evidence in cases. They study bones, and gather information such as the age, sex and condition or cause of death. The role of the forensic anthropologist in this case was to determine if the pieces of bone found at the cemetery by the women walking her dog, were forensically significance or not.
Question 2
a) In Ontario, forensic anthropologists serve as consultants for what specialized provincial government division?

b) Who can request the involvement of a forensic anthropologist?
The involvement of a forensic anthropologist
…show more content…
Establishing forensic significance is important because justice can be served to cases and people if it is less than 60 years.
b) What are the criteria for determining if bone is forensically significant?
Dr. Rogers (2015) mentioned that the criteria for determining if the bone is forensically significant is to first figure out if the bone is a human bone or animal bone. Next it must be determined whether it is of a modern individual or prehistoric. The time of death must also be determined as if it was less than 60 years old, someone could still be brought to justice. Lastly, the cause of the remains; so if it belonged to secret societies, medical school it would obviously not be forensically significant but if it was a homicide it would be.

c) Provide 4 examples of how Doctor Rogers’ applied the above criteria in this case study. For each example be sure to link Dr. Rogers’ determination to the overall question of forensic
…show more content…
Bone fragments would not be forensically significant coming from a farmer’s field if they were animal bones belonging to the farmer’s animals or prehistoric bones.

b) Were the fragments determined to be forensically significant? Justify your answer
The fragments were determined to be forensically insignificant as the top soil that brought the bones with it had been excavated by Dr. Rogers and her team. The other top soil found had more pieces of human bone. Dr. Rogers described all the other objects found in the soil and none of them led to becoming evidence for the bone pieces found to be deemed as forensically significant.
Question