Fred Korematsu

Words: 492
Pages: 2

In 1942, Fred Korematsu, an American born citizen of Japanese descent, refused to leave his home and be transported to an internment camp. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor in 1941, President Franklin Roosevelt issued Executive Order No. 34 which ordered every American citizen of Japanese descent be removed from the west coast and placed in temporary camps as a matter of national security. Korematsu refused to leave his home and was subsequently arrested and stood trial for his actions. He was found guilty and sentenced to prison. In 1944, his case reached the Supreme Court after he appealed in 1942. The Supreme Court ruled 6-3, upholding the conviction of Fred Korematsu. The law stated that after May 9, 1942, all citizens of Japanese ancestry were to be placed in these camps. There was never a question towards the loyalty of the petitioner. The courts observed an Act of Congress, of March 21, 1942, 56 Stat. 173. This act basically says that anyone who refuses to enter, remain in, leave, or commit any act in …show more content…
Two jurors both agreed that Korematsu was a citizen of this country, due to the fact that he was born on American soil. They also agreed that there was no reason to believe that he was disloyal to the United States or that he was a threat in any way. The third juror went on the basis of racism. This juror believed that removing Japanese Americans, both alien and non-alien, should not have been approved. He also believed that there should be limits when it comes to military discretion where martial law has not been declared. The majority opinion, however, was clear. They agreed that they were dealing solely with an exclusionary case. They believed that they only violation Korematsu should be tried for is his unwillingness to leave his home and be relocated. They were also disgusted that the dissenting opinions would refer to these camps as concentration camps. They were simply relocation