Graham V. Florida Case Summary

Words: 566
Pages: 3

In the miller vs Alabama case, a 14-year-old was sentenced to life without parole. He was transferred from a juvenile court to a circuit court in which case they were going to try him as an adult for capital murder during a course of arson. In the appeal Two cases were brought up in this sentencing and it was the Roper vs Simons and Grahams vs Florida. The reason Miller brought these cases up was because a minor cannot be sentenced to death and a minor cannot be imprisoned for life for a non-homicidal crime. Is sentencing a 14-year-old to life in prison without parole cruel and unusual punishment? And does it violate his eighth amendments? This case was held by the courts where it is unconstitutional to have mandatory sentencing a minor to life without the possibility of parole. Which is why the Graham v. Florida case was brought up. …show more content…
She had wrote “that mandatory life without parole for those under the age of 18 at the time of their crime does violate the 8th amendments prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.” And that children and adults are constitutionally different from one another so the sentencing purpose should be different. This remanded and reversed the supreme court’s decision . John Roberts dissent opinion was that it “could not plausible be described” as unusual since a majority of states supports them. He tried to argue with a sense of morality and social policy where he stated that their duty was to no answer such question but to apply the law since it is their duty to do so. However, the convicted youths was re-sentenced because the case was remanded to the trial